The Use of Self-Study in Health Professional Higher Education and Medical Education - A Mixed-Method Systematic Review

Rogan, Slavko; Taeymans, Jan; Zinzen, Evert (2023). The Use of Self-Study in Health Professional Higher Education and Medical Education - A Mixed-Method Systematic Review Health Professions Education, 9(2), pp. 58-71. Elsevier 10.55890/2452-3011.1037

[img]
Preview
Text
Rogan et al The use of self-study in health professional higher education 2023.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial (CC-BY-NC).

Download (853kB) | Preview

Purpose: Health profession education and medical education should implement primarily active learning units in the curriculum. Self-study/guided self-study is such a tool that promotes active learning, a method that involves students in their learning process. The implementation of active learning is intended to develop or consolidate practical skills (hands-on). This mixed-method systematic review evaluated the of self-study/guided self-study in the university landscape for health professions education and medical education. Another goal was to foster awareness of the method self-study/guided self-study. Method: A systematic literature search in CINAHL, Embase, ERIC, PubMed and Web of Science was performed. Additionally, a manual search was conducted. This article included qualitative, quantitative, or mixed-method study designs. Included articles were appraised using the JBI Critical Appraisal Tool for qualitative and quantitative research. Abductive thematic analysis was used to synthesize evidence. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed to determine the effects of self-study that develop or consolidate practical skills (hands-on) in health professional or medical students compared to traditional teaching. Results: Fifteen articles were included totaling 3949 students volunteering in the studies. Critical appraisal of the studies ranged from average to good. Seven studies reported the use of individual self-study. The overall weighted effect favored self-study compared to traditional teaching (SDM 0.30, 95%CI: 0.13-0.48, p = 0.003). Discussion: The synthesized findings suggested that self-study/guided self-study was used as individual self-study. Self-study/guided self-study could develop or consolidate practical skill (hands-on) in health professional and medical students. The self-study/guided self-study should be structured in such a way that individual learning, dyad and group learning are possible.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

School of Health Professions
School of Health Professions > Physiotherapy > Higher Education Research in Health Professions Group

Name:

Rogan, Slavko0000-0003-0865-2575;
Taeymans, Jan and
Zinzen, Evert

Subjects:

L Education > LB Theory and practice of education > LB2300 Higher Education

ISSN:

2452-3011

Publisher:

Elsevier

Language:

English

Submitter:

Slavko Rogan

Date Deposited:

09 Nov 2023 09:18

Last Modified:

09 Nov 2023 09:18

Publisher DOI:

10.55890/2452-3011.1037

Related URLs:

Uncontrolled Keywords:

Graduate education, Self-study, Self-directed learning, Independent learning, Self -education

ARBOR DOI:

10.24451/arbor.20268

URI:

https://arbor.bfh.ch/id/eprint/20268

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
Provide Feedback