Galasso, GiulioGiulioGalassoVoroshilova, NataliaNataliaVoroshilova2025-07-072025-07-072025-06https://doi.org/10.24451/dspace/11952https://arbor.bfh.ch/handle/arbor/45322This article investigates the postwar reconstruction of Milan through the lens of mass housing development and the emergence of the street-front garden as a defining yet unintended urban typology. In contrast to centrally planned models elsewhere in Europe, Milan's housing boom unfolded through small-scale private developments embedded within the city’s existing grid. This process gave rise to a “halfway modernism,” where radical architectural ideals were mediated by regulatory constraints, local traditions, and real estate pragmatism. The 1953 General Regulatory Plan formalized building practices that allowed for increased density through strategic setbacks, inadvertently institutionalizing the green street-front garden as both a spatial compromise and a status symbol. Architects—often part of the same bourgeois milieu as their clients—operated within close-knit professional and social networks, facilitating the dissemination of ideas across projects and scales. The article argues for a rethinking of architectural agency: rather than heroic interventions, it is the mastery of shared regulatory, cultural, and technical frameworks that shapes cities at scale.enPost-war reconstructionurban gardensDensificationRole of the architectNAmagazine_article