Potential and Actual Water Savings through Improved Irrigation Scheduling in Small-Scale Vegetable Production

Studer, Christoph; Spoehel, Simon (2019). Potential and Actual Water Savings through Improved Irrigation Scheduling in Small-Scale Vegetable Production Agronomy, 9(12), p. 888. mdpi 10.3390/agronomy9120888

[img]
Preview
Text (pdf)
agronomy-09-00888-v2.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY).

Download (5MB) | Preview

Appropriate irrigation scheduling for efficient water use is often a challenge for small-scale farmers using drip irrigation. In a trial with 12 farmers in Sébaco, Nicaragua, two tools to facilitate irrigation scheduling were tested: the Water Chart (a table indicating required irrigation doses) and tensiometers. The study aimed at evaluating if and to what extent simple tools can reduce irrigation water use and improve water productivity in drip-irrigated vegetable (beetroot; Beta vulgaris L.) production compared with the farmers’ usual practice. Irrigation water use was substantially reduced (around 20%) when farmers irrigated according to the tools. However, farmers did not fully adhere to the tool guidance, probably because they feared that their crop would not get sufficient water. Thus they still over-irrigated their crop: between 38% and 88% more water than recommended was used during the treatment period, resulting in 91% to 139% higher water use than required over the entire growing cycle. Water productivity of beetroot production was, therefore, much lower (around 3 kg/m3) than what can be achieved under comparable conditions, although yields were decent. Differences in crop yield and water productivity among treatments were not significant. The simplified Water Chart was not sufficiently understandable to farmers (and technicians), whereas tensiometers were better perceived, although they do not provide any indication on how much water to apply. We conclude that innovations such as drip irrigation or improved irrigation scheduling have to be appropriately introduced, e.g., by taking sufficient time to co-produce a common understanding about the technologies and their possible usefulness, and by ensuring adequate follow-up support.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

School of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences HAFL > Resource-efficient agricultural production systems
School of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences HAFL > HAFL Hugo P. Cecchini Institute
School of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences HAFL > Agriculture

Name:

Studer, Christoph and
Spoehel, Simon

Subjects:

S Agriculture > S Agriculture (General)
S Agriculture > SB Plant culture

ISSN:

2073-4395

Publisher:

mdpi

Language:

English

Submitter:

Christoph Studer

Date Deposited:

08 Jan 2020 14:19

Last Modified:

05 Oct 2020 14:17

Publisher DOI:

10.3390/agronomy9120888

Uncontrolled Keywords:

drip irrigation; irrigation scheduling tools; irrigation water use; water productivity; vegetable production; beetroot; Nicaragua; Central American Dry Corridor

ARBOR DOI:

10.24451/arbor.9905

URI:

https://arbor.bfh.ch/id/eprint/9905

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
Provide Feedback