Schenk, Karin; Stoffel, Liliane; Bürgin, Reto Arthur; Stevens, Bonnie; Bassler, Dirk; Schulzke, Sven; Nelle, Mathias; Cignacco Müller, Eva (2019). The influence of gestational age in the psychometric testing of the Bernese Pain Scale for Neonates BMC Pediatrics, 19(1), pp. 1-21. BioMed Central 10.1186/s12887-018-1380-8
|
Text
Schenk et al_2019_The influence of gestational age.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY). Download (1MB) | Preview |
Background Assessing pain in neonates is challenging because full-term and preterm neonates of different gestational ages (GAs) have widely varied reactions to pain. We validated the Bernese Pain Scale for Neonates (BPSN) by testing its use among a large sample of neonates that represented all GAs. Methods In this prospective multisite validation study, we assessed 154 neonates between 24 2/7 and 41 4/7 weeks GA, based on the results of 1–5 capillary heel sticks in their first 14 days of life. From each heel stick, we produced three video sequences: baseline; heel stick; and, recovery. Five blinded nurses rated neonates’ pain responses according to the BPSN. The underlying factor structure of the BPSN, interrater reliability, concurrent validity with the Premature Infant Pain Profile-Revised (PIPP-R), construct validity, sensitivity and specificity, and the relationship between behavioural and physiological indicators were explored. We considered GA and gender as individual contextual factors. Results The factor analyses resulted in a model where the following behaviours best fit the data: crying; facial expression; and, posture. Pain scores for these behavioural items increased on average more than 1 point during the heel stick phases compared to the baseline and recovery phases (p < 0.001). Among physiological items, heart rate was more sensitive to pain than oxygen saturation. Heart rate averaged 0.646 points higher during the heel stick than the recovery phases (p < 0.001). GA increased along with pain scores: for every additional week of gestation, the average increase of behavioural pain score was 0.063 points (SE = 0.01, t = 5.49); average heart rate increased 0.042 points (SE = 0.01, t = 6.15). Sensitivity and specificity analyses indicated that the cut-off should increase with GA. Modified BPSN showed good concurrent validity with the PIPP-R (r = 0.600–0.758, p < 0.001). Correlations between the modified behavioural subscale and the item heart rate were low (r = 0.102–0.379). Conclusions The modified BPSN that includes facial expression, crying, posture, and heart rate is a reliable and valid tool for assessing acute pain in full-term and preterm neonates, but our results suggest that adding different cut-off points for different GA-groups will improve the BPSN’s clinical usefulness. Trial registration The study was retrospectively registered in the database of Clinical Trial gov. Study ID-number: NCT 02749461. Registration date: 12 April 2016.
Item Type: |
Journal Article (Original Article) |
---|---|
Division/Institute: |
School of Health Professions School of Health Professions > Midwifery |
Name: |
Schenk, Karin; Stoffel, Liliane; Bürgin, Reto Arthur; Stevens, Bonnie; Bassler, Dirk; Schulzke, Sven; Nelle, Mathias and Cignacco Müller, Eva0000-0001-6773-4015 |
Subjects: |
B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology R Medicine > RJ Pediatrics R Medicine > RT Nursing |
ISSN: |
1471-2431 |
Publisher: |
BioMed Central |
Funders: |
[UNSPECIFIED] Schweizerischer Nationalfonds |
Projects: |
[UNSPECIFIED] Berner Schmerzscore für Neugeborene |
Language: |
English |
Submitter: |
Jean Anthony Grand-Guillaume-Perrenoud |
Date Deposited: |
17 Dec 2019 13:12 |
Last Modified: |
18 Dec 2020 13:28 |
Publisher DOI: |
10.1186/s12887-018-1380-8 |
Uncontrolled Keywords: |
pain assessment, neonates, premature infants, psychometric testing, contextual factors, gestational age, reliability, validity |
ARBOR DOI: |
10.24451/arbor.7967 |
URI: |
https://arbor.bfh.ch/id/eprint/7967 |