Allocation of environmental burdens in dairy systems: Expanding a biophysical approach for application to larger meat-to-milk ratios

Ineichen Colantuoni, Sebastian Manuel; Schenker, Urs; Nemecek, Thomas; Reidy, Beat (2022). Allocation of environmental burdens in dairy systems: Expanding a biophysical approach for application to larger meat-to-milk ratios Livestock Science, 261, p. 104955. Elsevier 10.1016/j.livsci.2022.104955

[img]
Preview
Text
Ineichen_et_al_2022-Allocation.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY).

Download (1MB) | Preview

The dairy sector is urged to reduce environmental impacts, such as greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. But dairy farms not only produce milk: surplus calves and culled cows also yield meat as co-product. To split environmental impacts between milk and meat, a biophysical allocation method proposed by the International Dairy Federation (IDF) is currently used. Its applicability to farms with large meat-to-milk output ratios (beef-to-milk ratio, BMR) may be limited and lead to wrong conclusions when assessing GHG emissions and mitigation measures at farm level. To overcome these limitations, we developed a biophysical allocation approach based on the net energy requirement for milk and meat production according to internationally agreed energy requirements for dairy cows. Both the enhanced and the existing allocation methods were tested on an international dataset that included farms with a large range of BMR, as can be found in dual-purpose production systems or on farms with low milk productivity. The results from the international dataset reveal that the allocation factor does not substantially change for production systems with low BMR. For BMR up to 0.03 kg live weight (LW)/kg of fat- and protein-corrected milk (FPCM), the maximum deviation in the allocation factor between the two methods was 0.047. For larger BMR, the developed method still allocated relevant shares of emissions to meat while the standard approach did not. The developed method is less sensitive to shifts in BMR, especially for low-performing dairy farms. In addition, both methods were tested on a dataset of 46 Swiss dairy farms. By increasing the longevity of cows (one additional lactation), the impacts of altered BMR on the modelled GHG emissions and their allocation on milk and meat could be assessed. Increased longevity resulted in fewer cows to be replaced, decreased emissions from the rearing of replacement stock (-444 kg CO2-equivalents/cow/year) and lower meat output (-61 kg LW/cow/year), as fewer cows were culled. Consequently, a larger share of emissions was allocated to milk. While the standard biophysical allocation approach did not result in reduced GHG emissions per kg of milk (+0.002 kg CO2-equivalents/kg FPCM), the newly developed approach generated a modest (-0.022 kg CO2-equivalents/kg FPCM), although not significant reduction. The effects of GHG mitigation measures that affect BMR are thus represented more accurately than when applying the standard approach. Based on the presented data, we encourage the revision of currently used international standards for allocating environmental impacts to milk and meat.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

School of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences HAFL
School of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences HAFL > Agriculture > Grasslands and Ruminant Production Systems

Name:

Ineichen Colantuoni, Sebastian Manuel0000-0002-8461-9825;
Schenker, Urs0000-0002-9437-0904;
Nemecek, Thomas0000-0001-8249-1170 and
Reidy, Beat0000-0002-8619-0209

Subjects:

S Agriculture > S Agriculture (General)
S Agriculture > SF Animal culture

ISSN:

18711413

Publisher:

Elsevier

Language:

English

Submitter:

Sebastian Manuel Ineichen Colantuoni

Date Deposited:

06 Jun 2023 15:45

Last Modified:

11 Jun 2023 01:37

Publisher DOI:

10.1016/j.livsci.2022.104955

Related URLs:

Uncontrolled Keywords:

Beef-to-milk ratio Greenhouse gas emissions Longevity Productive lifespan Life cycle assessment

ARBOR DOI:

10.24451/arbor.19283

URI:

https://arbor.bfh.ch/id/eprint/19283

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
Provide Feedback