Theorising Disability Care (Non-)Personalisation in European Countries: Comparing Personal Assistance Schemes in Switzerland, Germany, Sweden, and the United Kingdom

Tschanz, Christoph (2018). Theorising Disability Care (Non-)Personalisation in European Countries: Comparing Personal Assistance Schemes in Switzerland, Germany, Sweden, and the United Kingdom Social Inclusion, 6(2), pp. 22-33. Cogitatio Press 10.17645/si.v6i2.1318

[img]
Preview
Text
Tschanz_2018.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY).

Download (264kB) | Preview

This article examines four European countries (Switzerland, Germany, Sweden, and the United Kingdom) with respect to their degree of disability care personalisation. The approach is embedded in a broader theoretical analysis, which in turn is inspired by the notion of bivalent social justice as presented by Nancy Fraser (2003). The theoretical argument is that claims for personal assistance are part of a broader movement toward emancipation. However, it is argued that the specific set-tings of welfare regimes provide structures that empower or mitigate the possible implementation of personal assistance schemes. The author argues that conservative-corporatist welfare regimes provide less-supportive opportunity structures for policy change pertaining to personal assistance than other welfare regimes. This heuristic argument is developed fur-ther by looking more closely at key figures of Sweden, Germany, and the United Kingdom as being ideal-typical welfare regime cases. Furthermore, the case of Switzerland is outlined in an in-depth manner as it seems to have conservative-corporatist characteristics regarding the organisation of disability care while simultaneously being difficult to theorise. It is the aim of this article to serve as a first heuristic undertaking for analysing the low level of disability care personalisation in certain continental European cases.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

School of Social Work > Institute for Social Security and Social Policy
School of Social Work

Name:

Tschanz, Christoph0000-0003-4686-4659

Subjects:

H Social Sciences > HM Sociology
H Social Sciences > HN Social history and conditions. Social problems. Social reform

ISSN:

2183–2803

Publisher:

Cogitatio Press

Funders:

[7] Swiss National Science Foundation

Language:

English

Submitter:

Christoph Tschanz

Date Deposited:

15 Feb 2023 08:41

Last Modified:

15 Feb 2023 08:41

Publisher DOI:

10.17645/si.v6i2.1318

Uncontrolled Keywords:

comparative social policy; disability care; Nancy Fraser; personal assistance; personalisation; social movements; social services; social stratification; Switzerland; welfare state regimes

ARBOR DOI:

10.24451/arbor.18711

URI:

https://arbor.bfh.ch/id/eprint/18711

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
Provide Feedback