Evaluation of the PrioCHECK™ Trichinella AAD kit to detect Trichinella spiralis, T. britovi, and T. pseudospiralis larvae in pork using the automated digestion method Trichomatic-35

Basso, Walter; Marreros, Nelson; Hofmann, Larissa; Salvisberg, Christine; Lundström-Stadelmann, Britta; Frey, Caroline F. (2022). Evaluation of the PrioCHECK™ Trichinella AAD kit to detect Trichinella spiralis, T. britovi, and T. pseudospiralis larvae in pork using the automated digestion method Trichomatic-35 Parasitology International, 86, p. 102449. Elsevier 10.1016/j.parint.2021.102449

[img]
Preview
Text
1-s2.0-S1383576921001677-main.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY).

Download (6MB) | Preview

Trichinellosis is a potentially deadly parasitic zoonosis that is contracted by consuming undercooked infected meat. Reliable detection of infectious Trichinella spp. larvae in meat is therefore pivotal to ensure consumer's safety. The recently authorised PrioCHECK™ Trichinella Alternative Artificial Digestion (AAD) test kit appears promising when used with the standard magnetic stirrer method, but evaluation with other apparatus types is lacking. In this study, the performance of the AAD kit in an adapted Trichomatic-35 (TM5) instrument was evaluated, first, at the Swiss National Reference Laboratory for trichinellosis (NRL); second, in a ring trial involving four Swiss official laboratories. Proficiency pork samples spiked with larvae of Trichinella spiralis, T. britovi, or T. pseudospiralis were tested with the AAD kit and with the reference pepsin-HCl digestion method in TM35 instruments. At the NRL, both methods yielded identical qualitative and similar quantitative results independently of the Trichinella species. In the ring trial, satisfactory results were obtained for 47/50 (94.0%) (AAD) and 62/67 (92.5%) (reference method) of the analysed samples. Technical problems impairing analysis were more frequently observed with the AAD kit (n = 22) than with the reference method (n = 5) and were mainly (16/22) reported by one of the external labs. When no technical issues were recorded, the performance of both methods was comparable, in agreement with the observations at the NRL; however, these results suggest a need for further training with the kit and standardisation of the adapted TM35 instruments.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

School of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences HAFL > Multifunctional Forest Management > Forest Ecosystem and Management

Name:

Basso, Walter;
Marreros, Nelson0000-0001-6802-4912;
Hofmann, Larissa;
Salvisberg, Christine;
Lundström-Stadelmann, Britta and
Frey, Caroline F.

Subjects:

R Medicine > RZ Other systems of medicine
S Agriculture > SF Animal culture

ISSN:

13835769

Publisher:

Elsevier

Funders:

[UNSPECIFIED] Federal Food Safety and Veterinary Office

Language:

English

Submitter:

Nelson Marreros

Date Deposited:

15 Dec 2021 09:46

Last Modified:

15 Dec 2021 09:46

Publisher DOI:

10.1016/j.parint.2021.102449

PubMed ID:

34481946

Uncontrolled Keywords:

Trichinellosis, Pig, Artificial digestion, Diagnostic, Pepsin, Serin-endopeptidase

ARBOR DOI:

10.24451/arbor.16013

URI:

https://arbor.bfh.ch/id/eprint/16013

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
Provide Feedback