Repository logo
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Français
Log In
New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. CRIS
  3. Publication
  4. Laboratory Evaluation of Four Different Devices for Secretion Mobilization: Acapella Choice, Green and Blue Versus Water Bottle
 

Laboratory Evaluation of Four Different Devices for Secretion Mobilization: Acapella Choice, Green and Blue Versus Water Bottle

URI
https://arbor.bfh.ch/handle/arbor/32594
Version
Published
Date Issued
2014
Author(s)
Müller, Gabi
Bersch-Porada, Ines
Koch-Borner, Sabrina
Raab, Anja  
Jonker, Marga
Baumberger, Michael
Michel, Franz
Type
Article
Language
English
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Secretion removal is a key issue in patients with respiratory diseases, and is
known to be most effective at vibration frequencies of 13 Hz and with the greatest amplitudes
possible. The Acapella devices and the water bottle are used for secretion removal in daily clinical
practice but without detailed knowledge on optimal settings. The aim of this study was to evaluate
the 3 different Acapella devices and the water bottle at various settings and flows to determine the
optimal devices and settings for effective secretion removal. METHODS: Three different Acapella
devices were tested at flows of 6, 12, 20, 30, 40, and 50 L/min, and at all 5 settings. The water bottle
was filled with 5, 10, or 15 cm of water, and tested at flows of 3, 6, 10, 12, and 20 L/min. For all
devices and combinations of settings, we measured the frequency and amplitude of the vibrations,
as well as the required pressure to generate vibrations. RESULTS: Setting 4 was the best for all 3
Acapella devices, and the filling height of the water bottle should be 5 cm. At these settings, all
devices elicited vibration frequencies between 12 and 15 Hz, which is theoretically optimal for
secretion mobilization. The resistance pressures of the devices to elicit these vibrations were between 5 and 11 cm H2O. However, the Acapella devices elicit higher vibration amplitudes (5– 8 cm
H2O) than the water bottle (1.8 cm H2O) CONCLUSIONS: Setting 4 was optimal for all 3 Acapella
devices. The Acapella devices may be more efficient for secretion mobilization than the water bottle,
because they elicit greater amplitude of vibrations. Key words: airway clearance therapy; bronchial
clearance; chest physiotherapy; evaluation of devices; mucus; oscillating positive expiratory pressure;
respiratory secretions
Subjects
RM Therapeutics. Pharmacology
RZ Other systems of medicine
DOI
10.24451/arbor.13137
https://doi.org/10.24451/arbor.13137
Publisher DOI
10.4187/respcare.02654
Journal
Respiratory Care
ISSN
0020-1324
Publisher URL
http://rc.rcjournal.com/content/59/5/673
Organization
Gesundheit  
Volume
59
Issue
5
Publisher
American Association for Respiratory Care
Submitter
Raab, Anja
Citation apa
Müller, G., Bersch-Porada, I., Koch-Borner, S., Raab, A., Jonker, M., Baumberger, M., & Michel, F. (2014). Laboratory Evaluation of Four Different Devices for Secretion Mobilization: Acapella Choice, Green and Blue Versus Water Bottle. In Respiratory Care (Vol. 59, Issue 5). American Association for Respiratory Care. https://doi.org/10.24451/arbor.13137
File(s)
Loading...
Thumbnail Image

restricted

Name

AMR_Acapella.pdf

License
Publisher
Version
published
Size

219.49 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

f456727151799ed780037c53210c4aa6

About ARBOR

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - System hosted and mantained by 4Science

  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback
  • Our institution