Repository logo
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Français
Log In
New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. CRIS
  3. Publication
  4. Evaluating Abdominal Obesity by Waist Circumference, Anthropometric Indices and Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis: A Comparative Pilot Study
 

Evaluating Abdominal Obesity by Waist Circumference, Anthropometric Indices and Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis: A Comparative Pilot Study

URI
https://arbor.bfh.ch/handle/arbor/46119
Version
Published
Identifiers
10.1002/osp4.70078
Date Issued
2025
Author(s)
Nahorna, Anastasiia  
Baur, Heiner  
Type
Article
Language
English
Subjects

bioelectrical impedan...

waist circumference (...

waist-to-height ratio...

waist-to-hip ratio (W...

Abstract
Introduction: Abdominal obesity significantly increases the risk of various health conditions, making accurate assessment crucial for diagnosis and treatment. This study compares the effectiveness of anthropometric methods and conventional bioelectrical impedance analysis in evaluating abdominal obesity. Materials and Methods: Twenty adults (10 males, 10 females; age 45 � 11.4 years; height 170 � 8.63 cm; body weight 91.3 � 19.2 kg; BMI 31.7 � 5.31 kg/m 2) participated in a single-visit pilot study at the Bern Movement Lab at Bern University of Applied Sciences. Anthropometric measurements; including body weight, height, waist and hip circumferences; anthropometric indices; including BMI, waist-to-hip ratio, waist-to-height ratio and conventional bioelectrical impedance analysis were collected. Spearman's Rank Correlation was used for statistical analysis due to non-normal data distribution. Results: Waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, and waist-to-height ratio consistently classified all participants as having abdominal obesity. In contrast, bioelectrical impedance analysis identified fewer cases, with only 40% of men and 10% of women classified as having abdominal obesity. Strong correlations were observed between waist circumference, waist-to-height ratio, and visceral fat, whereas waist-to-hip ratio showed weaker correlations. Conclusions: Simple anthropometric methods such as waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, and waist-to-height ratio are useful for evaluating abdominal obesity, with waist-to-height ratio often considered a more reliable predictor of central obesity. However, bioelectrical impedance analysis shows inconsistencies, and the waist-to-height ratio should be considered as a standard metric in future guidelines. Large-scale multiethnic studies are recommended to validate these findings. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24451/arbor.12542
Publisher DOI
10.1002/osp4.70078
Journal or Serie
Obesity Science & Practice
ISSN
2055-2238
Organization
Gesundheit  
Physiotherapie  
Neuromuskuläre Kontrolle  
Volume
11
Project(s)
Biomechanical characteristics and anecdotal reports of low back pain during activities of daily living in individuals with central obesity.
Publisher
John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Submitter
Nahorna, Anastasiia
Citation apa
Nahorna, A., & Baur, H. (2025). Evaluating Abdominal Obesity by Waist Circumference, Anthropometric Indices and Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis: A Comparative Pilot Study. In Obesity Science & Practice (Vol. 11). John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://doi.org/10.24451/arbor.12542
Contact us
Contact us
File(s)
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Download
Name

Obesity Science Practice - 2025 - Nahorna - Evaluating Abdominal Obesity by Waist Circumference Anthropometric Indices.pdf

License
Attribution 4.0 International
Version
published
Size

395.02 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

be8c76036259674777e51d8aae34fe26

About ARBOR

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - System hosted and mantained by 4Science

  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback
  • Our institution