Audio-biofeedback versus the scale method for improving partial weight-bearing adherence in healthy older adults: a randomised trial
Version
Published
Date Issued
2024-08-17
Author(s)
Bern University of Applied Sciences
Häckel, Sonja
University Hospital of Bern
Kämpf, Tobias
University Hospital of Bern
Bern University of Applied Sciences
Bastian, Johannes Dominik
Type
Article
Language
English
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate how audio-biofeedback during the instruction of partial weight-bearing affected adherence, compared to traditional methods, in older adults; and to investigate the influence of individual characteristics.
Methods: The primary outcome measure of this randomised controlled trial was the amount of load, measured as the ground reaction force, on the partial weight-bearing leg. The secondary outcome was the influence of individual characteristics on the amount of load. Included were healthy volunteers 60 years of age or older without gait impairment. Participants were randomly allocated to one of two groups; blinding was not possible. Partial weight-bearing of 20 kg was trained using crutches with audio-biofeedback (intervention group) or a bathroom scale (control group). The degree of weight-bearing was measured during six activities with sensor insoles. A mean load between 15 and 25 kg was defined as adherent.
Results: There was no statistically significant difference in weight-bearing between the groups for all activities measured. For the sit-stand-sit activity, weight-bearing was within the adherence range of 15-25 kg (audio-biofeedback: 21.7 ± 16.6 kg; scale: 22.6 ± 13 kg). For standing, loading was below the lower threshold (10 ± 7 vs. 10 ± 10 kg). Weight-bearing was above the upper threshold for both groups for: walking (26 ± 11 vs. 34 ± 16), step-up (29 ± 18 vs. 34 ± 20 kg) and step-down (28 ± 15 vs. 35 ± 19 kg). Lower level of cognitive function, older age, and higher body mass index were correlated with overloading.
Conclusion: Audio-biofeedback delivered no statistically significant benefit over the scale method. Lower cognitive function, older age and higher body mass index were associated with overloading.
Trial registration: Not applicable due not being a clinical trial and due to the cross-sectional design (one measurement point, no health intervention, no change in health of a person).
Keywords: Aged; Feedback; Randomized controlled trial; Rehabilitation; Sensory; Weight-bearing; Weights and measures.
Methods: The primary outcome measure of this randomised controlled trial was the amount of load, measured as the ground reaction force, on the partial weight-bearing leg. The secondary outcome was the influence of individual characteristics on the amount of load. Included were healthy volunteers 60 years of age or older without gait impairment. Participants were randomly allocated to one of two groups; blinding was not possible. Partial weight-bearing of 20 kg was trained using crutches with audio-biofeedback (intervention group) or a bathroom scale (control group). The degree of weight-bearing was measured during six activities with sensor insoles. A mean load between 15 and 25 kg was defined as adherent.
Results: There was no statistically significant difference in weight-bearing between the groups for all activities measured. For the sit-stand-sit activity, weight-bearing was within the adherence range of 15-25 kg (audio-biofeedback: 21.7 ± 16.6 kg; scale: 22.6 ± 13 kg). For standing, loading was below the lower threshold (10 ± 7 vs. 10 ± 10 kg). Weight-bearing was above the upper threshold for both groups for: walking (26 ± 11 vs. 34 ± 16), step-up (29 ± 18 vs. 34 ± 20 kg) and step-down (28 ± 15 vs. 35 ± 19 kg). Lower level of cognitive function, older age, and higher body mass index were correlated with overloading.
Conclusion: Audio-biofeedback delivered no statistically significant benefit over the scale method. Lower cognitive function, older age and higher body mass index were associated with overloading.
Trial registration: Not applicable due not being a clinical trial and due to the cross-sectional design (one measurement point, no health intervention, no change in health of a person).
Keywords: Aged; Feedback; Randomized controlled trial; Rehabilitation; Sensory; Weight-bearing; Weights and measures.
Subjects
RC1200 Sports Medicine
Publisher DOI
ISSN
1863-9933
Organization
Volume
50
Publisher
Springer
Submitter
Baur, Heiner
Citation apa
von Aesch, A. V., Häckel, S., Kämpf, T., Baur, H., & Bastian, J. D. (2024). Audio-biofeedback versus the scale method for improving partial weight-bearing adherence in healthy older adults: a randomised trial (Vol. 50). Springer. https://doi.org/10.24451/dspace/11335
File(s)![Thumbnail Image]()
Loading...
open access
Name
vonAesch 2024 audio-biofeedback partial weight bearing Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg .pdf
Description
Version published
License
Attribution 4.0 International
Size
725.43 KB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
260ef0b74d1172a9ffb047e8a7feeb6b
