Repository logo
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Français
Log In
New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. CRIS
  3. Publication
  4. FeetBack – Redirecting touch sensation from a prosthetic hand to the human foot
 

FeetBack – Redirecting touch sensation from a prosthetic hand to the human foot

URI
https://arbor.bfh.ch/handle/arbor/34687
Version
Published
Date Issued
2022-10-26
Author(s)
Morand, Rafael  
Brusa, Tobia  
Schnüriger, Nina
Catanzaro, Sabrina
Berli, Martin
Koch, Volker M.  
Type
Article
Language
English
Subjects

Upper limb prosthesis...

Abstract
Introduction: Adding sensory feedback to myoelectric prosthetic hands was shown to enhance the user experience in terms of controllability and device embodiment. Often this is realized non-invasively by adding devices, such as actuators or electrodes, within the prosthetic shaft to deliver the desired feedback. However, adding a feedback system in the socket adds more weight, steals valuable space, and may interfere with myoelectric signals. To circumvent said drawbacks we tested for the first time if force feedback from
a prosthetic hand could be redirected to another similarly sensitive part of the
body: the foot.

Methods: We developed a vibrotactile insole that vibrates depending on the sensed force on the prosthetic fingers. This self-controlled clinical pilot trial included four experienced users of myoelectric prostheses. The participants solved two types of tasks with the artificial hands: 1) sorting objects depending on their plasticity with the feedback insole but without audio-visual feedback, and 2) manipulating fragile, heavy, and delicate objects with and without the feedback insole. The sorting task was evaluated with Goodman-Kruskal’s gamma for ranked correlation. The manipulation tasks were assessed by the
success rate.

Results: The results from the sorting task with vibrotactile feedback showed a substantial positive effect. The success rates for manipulation tasks with fragile and heavy objects were high under both conditions (feedback on or off, respectively). The manipulation task with delicate objects revealed inferior success with feedback in three of four participants.

Conclusion: We introduced a novel approach to touch sensation in myoelectric prostheses. The results for the sorting task and the manipulation tasks diverged. This is likely linked to the availability of various feedback sources. Our results for redirected feedback to the feet fall in line with previous similar studies that applied feedback to the residual arm.
Subjects
TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
DOI
10.24451/arbor.17868
https://doi.org/10.24451/arbor.17868
Publisher DOI
10.3389/fnins.2022.1019880
Journal or Serie
Frontiers in Neuroscience
ISSN
1662-453X
Publisher URL
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnins.2022.1019880/full
Related URL
https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/neuroscience publication
Organization
Institute for Human Centered Engineering (HUCE)  
HUCE / Labor für Biomedical Engineering  
Technik und Informatik  
Sponsors
Stiftung Inventus Bern
Volume
16
Project(s)
FeetBack
Publisher
Frontiers Media
Submitter
MorandR
Citation apa
Morand, R., Brusa, T., Schnüriger, N., Catanzaro, S., Berli, M., & Koch, V. M. (2022). FeetBack – Redirecting touch sensation from a prosthetic hand to the human foot. In Frontiers in Neuroscience (Vol. 16). Frontiers Media. https://doi.org/10.24451/arbor.17868
File(s)
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Download

open access

Name

fnins-16-1019880.pdf

License
Attribution 4.0 International
Version
published
Size

1.05 MB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

a2b24a8aba31488fd3a43e2ac29f4e7f

About ARBOR

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - System hosted and mantained by 4Science

  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback
  • Our institution