Repository logo
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Français
Log In
New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. CRIS
  3. Publication
  4. Sex differences in clinical presentation, treatment response, and side effects of nutritional therapy among patients at nutritional risk: a secondary analysis of the randomized clinical trial EFFORT
 

Sex differences in clinical presentation, treatment response, and side effects of nutritional therapy among patients at nutritional risk: a secondary analysis of the randomized clinical trial EFFORT

URI
https://arbor.bfh.ch/handle/arbor/44741
Version
Published
Date Issued
2024-11
Author(s)
Wunderle, Carla
Suter, Sandra S
Endner, Nele
Haenggi, Eliane
Kaegi-Braun, Nina
Tribolet, Pascal  
Stanga, Zeno
Mueller, Beat
Schuetz, Philipp
Type
Article
Language
English
Subjects

individualized nutrit...

malnutrition

nutritional risk scre...

nutritional support

sex difference

Abstract
Considering sex-specific factors has become an increasingly recognized area for research and practice, in the field of clinical nutrition, there is insufficient evidence regarding differences in clinical presentation, treatment response, and side effects of nutritional therapy among female and male patients. We hypothesized that the clinical presentation, response to nutritional therapy, and side effects from the intervention would differ in the two sexes. This secondary analysis investigated differences among female and male patients at risk for malnutrition regarding initial presentation, clinical outcomes, and treatment response in patients included in the Effect of Early Nutritional Support on Frailty, Functional Outcomes, and Recovery of Malnourished Medical Inpatients Trial (EFFORT), a randomized controlled trial comparing individualized nutritional support to usual care. Of 2028 patients included in the trial, 964 were females and 1064 were males. The nutritional history and clinical presentation of female patients was different: they consumed less food and had a greater loss of appetite than the male population. Male patients had higher risk for mortality at 180 d [27% compared with 19%; adjusted hazards ratio (HR): 1.35; 95% CI: 1.12, 1.63] and further adverse clinical outcomes. However, there was no difference in the effect of nutritional support on mortality among female and male patients (HR: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.45, 1.27, compared with HR: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.54, 1.21, respectively; P-interaction = 0.939). Results of this multicenter randomized trial suggest that multimorbid female inpatients have a different clinical presentation and are more prone to loss of appetite and reduced daily dietary intake than male inpatients. Importantly, the favorable response to nutritional interventions was similar in both sexes.
This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02517476.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24451/dspace/11526
Publisher DOI
10.1016/j.ajcnut.2024.09.020
Journal
The American journal of clinical nutrition
ISSN
0002-9165 (Print) 1938-3207 (Online)
Publisher URL
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0002916524007524
Organization
Gesundheit  
Volume
120
Issue
5
Publisher
Elsevier
Submitter
TriboletP
Citation apa
Wunderle, C., Suter, S. S., Endner, N., Haenggi, E., Kaegi-Braun, N., Tribolet, P., Stanga, Z., Mueller, B., & Schuetz, P. (2024). Sex differences in clinical presentation, treatment response, and side effects of nutritional therapy among patients at nutritional risk: a secondary analysis of the randomized clinical trial EFFORT. In The American journal of clinical nutrition (Vol. 120, Issue 5). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.24451/dspace/11526
File(s)
Loading...
Thumbnail Image

restricted

Name

publication_EFFORT_sex diff.pdf

License
Publisher
Version
accepted
Size

610.68 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

effa556cb4ad86332a80864bb585b31e

About ARBOR

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - System hosted and mantained by 4Science

  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback
  • Our institution