Repository logo
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Français
Log In
New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. CRIS
  3. Publication
  4. Mapping the Digital Landscape: An Analysis of Party Differences between Conventional and Digital Policy Positions
 

Mapping the Digital Landscape: An Analysis of Party Differences between Conventional and Digital Policy Positions

URI
https://arbor.bfh.ch/handle/arbor/42393
Version
Published
Date Issued
2020
Author(s)
Schwarz Badertscher, Daniel  
Fivaz, Jan  
Neuroni, Alessia  
Type
Article
Language
English
Subjects

Comparison of polit...

digital awareness of...

digital policy spac...

party positions on d...

Abstract
Although digitization is a buzzword in almost every election campaign, the political parties leave voters largely in the dark about their specific positions on digital issues. In the run-up to the 2019 elections in Switzerland, the ‘Digitization Monitor’ project (DMP) was launched in order to change this situation. Within the framework of the DMP, all 4,736 candidates were surveyed about their digital policy positions and values. The DMP is designed as a digital policy supplement to the existing ‘smartvote’ voting advice application. This enabled a direct comparison of the digital policy attitudes according to the DMP with the topics of the ‘smartvote’ questionnaire which are comprehensive in content but mainly related to conventional policy areas. This paper’s main research goal is to analyze and visualize possible differences between conventional and digital policy areas in terms of response patterns between and within political parties. The analysis is based on dimensionality reduction methods (multidimensional scaling and principal component analysis) for the visualization of inter-party differences, and on standard deviation as a measure of variation for the evaluation of intra-party unity. The results reveal that digital issues show a lower degree of inter-party polarization compared to conventional policy areas. Thus, the parties have more common ground in issues on digitization than in conventional policy areas. In contrast, the study reveals a mixed picture regarding intra-party unity. Homogeneous parties show a lower degree of unity in digitization issues whereas parties with heterogeneous positions in conventional areas have more united positions in digital areas. All things considered, the findings are encouraging as less polarized conditions apply to the debate on digital development compared to conventional politics. For the future, it would be desirable if in further countries similar projects to the DMP could emerge to broaden the basis for conclusions
Subjects
JA Political science (General)
DOI
10.24451/arbor.13080
https://doi.org/10.24451/arbor.13080
Journal
International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences
Publisher URL
https://publications.waset.org/10011467/pdf
Related URL
https://arbor.bfh.ch/12364/ dataset
Organization
Digital Democracy  
Volume
14
Issue
9
Project(s)
Digitalisierungsmonitor 2019
Publisher
WASET World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology
Submitter
Schwarz Badertscher, Daniel
Citation apa
Schwarz Badertscher, D., Fivaz, J., & Neuroni, A. (2020). Mapping the Digital Landscape: An Analysis of Party Differences between Conventional and Digital Policy Positions. In International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences (Vol. 14, Issue 9). WASET World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology. https://doi.org/10.24451/arbor.13080
File(s)
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name

pdf

License
Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International
Version
published
Size

202 B

Format

HTML

Checksum (MD5)

6024a10dd503807f8ae45ede05e0acc3

About ARBOR

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - System hosted and mantained by 4Science

  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback
  • Our institution