Development and validation of models to predict respiratory function in persons with long-term spinal cord injury
Version
Published
Date Issued
2019-06-19
Author(s)
de Groot, Sonja
Berlowitz, David J.
Post, Marcel W. M.
Adriaansen, Jacinthe
Hopman, Maria
Müller, Gabi
Type
Article
Language
English
Abstract
Study Design
Multicenter, cross-sectional study.
Objectives
To validate previously developed respiratory function prediction models for persons with long-term spinal cord injury (SCI) and if necessary develop and validate new models.
Setting
Ten SCI rehabilitation centers.
Methods
Five respiratory function parameters were measured in adults with chronic, traumatic, motor complete SCI (C4-T12). First, the models published in 2012 were validated using Bland-Altman plots. Then, new models were calculated using 80% of the dataset by multiple regression analysis with the candidate predictors gender, age, height, weight, time post injury (TPI), lesion level, and smoking. In a third step, the new models were validated using the other 20% of the dataset by Bland–Altman plots.
Results
In total 613 participants were included. For persons with long-term SCI, the 2012 models were poorly predictive, especially for respiratory muscle strength (R2 = 0.4). Significant predictors for all respiratory function parameters in the new models (R2 = 0.7–0.8) were lesion level, gender and weight. Small effects on single outcome parameters were observed for
TPI and age whereas smoking had no effect. For the new models the mean differences between measured and predicted values for respiratory muscle strength were 4.0 ± 36.0 cm H2O and for lung function parameters −0.5 ± 1.2 L (FVC), −0.3 ± 0.9 L (FEV1) and −0.5 ± 2.0 L/s (PEF).
Conclusion
We did not find better models for lung function in long-term SCI but those for respiratory muscle strength showed better accuracy.
Sponsorship
The content of this publication was developed under grant from Wings for Life, grant number WFL-CH-017/14.
Multicenter, cross-sectional study.
Objectives
To validate previously developed respiratory function prediction models for persons with long-term spinal cord injury (SCI) and if necessary develop and validate new models.
Setting
Ten SCI rehabilitation centers.
Methods
Five respiratory function parameters were measured in adults with chronic, traumatic, motor complete SCI (C4-T12). First, the models published in 2012 were validated using Bland-Altman plots. Then, new models were calculated using 80% of the dataset by multiple regression analysis with the candidate predictors gender, age, height, weight, time post injury (TPI), lesion level, and smoking. In a third step, the new models were validated using the other 20% of the dataset by Bland–Altman plots.
Results
In total 613 participants were included. For persons with long-term SCI, the 2012 models were poorly predictive, especially for respiratory muscle strength (R2 = 0.4). Significant predictors for all respiratory function parameters in the new models (R2 = 0.7–0.8) were lesion level, gender and weight. Small effects on single outcome parameters were observed for
TPI and age whereas smoking had no effect. For the new models the mean differences between measured and predicted values for respiratory muscle strength were 4.0 ± 36.0 cm H2O and for lung function parameters −0.5 ± 1.2 L (FVC), −0.3 ± 0.9 L (FEV1) and −0.5 ± 2.0 L/s (PEF).
Conclusion
We did not find better models for lung function in long-term SCI but those for respiratory muscle strength showed better accuracy.
Sponsorship
The content of this publication was developed under grant from Wings for Life, grant number WFL-CH-017/14.
Subjects
RM Therapeutics. Pharmacology
RZ Other systems of medicine
Publisher DOI
Journal or Serie
Spinal Cord
ISSN
1362-4393
Organization
Volume
57
Issue
12
Publisher
Springer Nature
Submitter
Raab, Anja
Citation apa
Raab, A., de Groot, S., Berlowitz, D. J., Post, M. W. M., Adriaansen, J., Hopman, M., & Müller, G. (2019). Development and validation of models to predict respiratory function in persons with long-term spinal cord injury. In Spinal Cord (Vol. 57, Issue 12). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.24451/arbor.13135
File(s)![Thumbnail Image]()
Loading...
restricted
Name
AMR_validation_models_SCI.pdf
License
Publisher
Version
published
Size
1.16 MB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
7485a0c35df20936d908db1ea95a63ee
