Controversies in the determination of death: perspectives from Switzerland.
Version
Published
Date Issued
2012-08-13
Author(s)
Rid, Annette
Type
Article
Language
English
Abstract
In 1968, an Ad Hoc committee at the Harvard Medical School advanced new criteria for determining death. It proposed that patients in irreversible coma with no discernible central nervous system activity were actually dead. The committee paved the way for the “whole brain” definition of death, which has reached broad public acceptance and legal enactment in many countries. Despite this, the philosophical and ethical debate about the “whole brain” definition of death is far from being closed. This paper analyses the ongoing controversy and evaluates the recent revision of the Swiss Academy of Medical Sciences guidelines for determining death.
Key words: medical ethics; determination of death; end-of-life; organ transplantation
Key words: medical ethics; determination of death; end-of-life; organ transplantation
Subjects
BJ Ethics
R Medicine (General)
Publisher DOI
Journal or Serie
Swiss Medical Weekly
ISSN
1424-7860
Publisher URL
Organization
Volume
142
Issue
w13667
Publisher
EMH Schweizerischer Ärzteverlag
Submitter
Monteverde, Settimio
Citation apa
Monteverde, S., & Rid, A. (2012). Controversies in the determination of death: perspectives from Switzerland. In Swiss Medical Weekly (Vol. 142, Issue w13667). EMH Schweizerischer Ärzteverlag. https://doi.org/10.24451/arbor.12056
File(s)![Thumbnail Image]()
Loading...
Name
smw_2012_13667.pdf
License
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Version
published
Size
435.49 KB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
a82d73ee3890ac51a7a62982d52bc819
