Repository logo
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Français
Log In
New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. CRIS
  3. Publication
  4. The efficacy and real-world effectiveness of a diet low in fermentable oligo-, di-, monosaccharides and polyols in irritable bowel syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis
 

The efficacy and real-world effectiveness of a diet low in fermentable oligo-, di-, monosaccharides and polyols in irritable bowel syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis

URI
https://arbor.bfh.ch/handle/arbor/37107
Version
Published
Date Issued
2024-05-07
Author(s)
Jent, Sandra  
Bez, Natalie Sara  
Haddad, Joyce  
Catalano, Loan  
Egger, Kim Stefanie
Raia, Michela
Tedde, Giulia Simona
Rogler, Gerhard
Type
Article
Language
English
Subjects

FODMAP diet Irritable...

Abstract
Background & aims
A diet low in fermentable oligo-, di-, monosaccharides, and polyols (LFD) has been shown to effectively reduce irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) symptoms. Effects resulting from real-world studies may differ from those seen in efficacy studies because of the diversity of patients in real-world settings. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the effect of the LFD on reducing IBS symptoms and improving the quality of life (QoL) in efficacy trials and real-world studies.
Methods
Major databases, trial registries, dissertations, and journals were systematically searched for studies on the LFD in adults with IBS. Meta-analysis was conducted using a random effects model with standardized mean differences (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Outcomes of interest were all patient-reported: stool consistency, stool frequency, abdominal pain, overall symptoms, adequate symptom relief, IBS-specific QoL and adherence to the LFD.
Results
Eleven efficacy and 19 real-world studies were reviewed. The meta-analysis results for abdominal pain (SMD 0.35, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.54) and QoL (SMD 0.23, 95% CI -0.05 to 0.50) showed the LFD was beneficial in efficacy studies with no statistically significant results for stool frequency (SMD 0.71, 95% CI 0.34 to 1.07). Real-world studies found improvements in abdominal pain and QoL. Due to heterogeneity, no meta-analysis was done for stool consistency and overall symptoms. In these outcomes, results were mostly supportive of the LFD, but they were not always statistically significant.
Conclusions
The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis suggest the LFD improves outcomes compared to a control diet (efficacy studies) or baseline data (real-world studies). Because of diverse study designs and heterogeneity of results, a clear superiority of the LFD over control diets could not be concluded. There are no indications of an efficacy-effectiveness gap for the LFD in adults with IBS.
Subjects
R Medicine (General)
RS Pharmacy and materia medica
DOI
10.24451/arbor.21907
https://doi.org/10.24451/arbor.21907
Publisher DOI
10.1016/j.clnu.2024.05.014
Journal or Serie
Clinical Nutrition
ISSN
0261-5614
Publisher URL
https://www.clinicalnutritionjournal.com/article/S0261-5614(24)00160-2/fulltext
Organization
Gesundheit  
Ernährung und Diätetik  
Sponsors
Spendenstiftung Bank Vontobel
BFH
Volume
43
Issue
6
Project(s)
EQ-ERB - Ergebnisqualität in der Ernährungsberatung
Publisher
Elsevier
Submitter
Jent, Sandra
Citation apa
Jent, S., Bez, N. S., Haddad, J., Catalano, L., Egger, K. S., Raia, M., Tedde, G. S., & Rogler, G. (2024). The efficacy and real-world effectiveness of a diet low in fermentable oligo-, di-, monosaccharides and polyols in irritable bowel syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis. In Clinical Nutrition (Vol. 43, Issue 6, pp. 1551–1562). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.24451/arbor.21907
File(s)
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Download

open access

Name

PIIS0261561424001602.pdf

License
Attribution 4.0 International
Version
published
Size

2.19 MB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

f3c1bd0f0309dd1406ec00a4ce2171bb

About ARBOR

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - System hosted and mantained by 4Science

  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback
  • Our institution