Seeing the trees without the forest: What and how can agroforestry and urban forestry learn from each other?
Date Issued
2024-05-28
Author(s)
Sousa-Silva, Rita
Morhart, Christoph
Sheppard, Jonathan P.
Albrecht, Stefanie
Anys, Markus
Beyer, Friderike
Blumenstein, Kathrin
Reinecke, Sabine
Seifert, Thomas
Whitehead, Ian
Pauleit, Stephan
Bauhus, Jürgen
Type
Article
Language
English
Abstract
Purpose of Review: Agroforestry and urban forestry have evolved mainly as separate disciplines, although they share a long history of tree cultivation in man-made environments. Here, we review their common threads, exploring how trees in both systems interact with and shape their environments. We examine common themes and methodologies – ranging from tree growth dynamics to environmental stressors, ecosystem services provision, and questions of governance – and identify opportunities for synergies between these felds.
Recent Findings: We emphasize the potential of agroforestry and urban forestry for enhancing multifunctional landscapes. Geographical divides in research are evident, with agroforestry predominantly studied in the Global South and urban forestry receiving more attention in the Global North. However, signifcant research gaps provide avenues for collaboration, for instance, addressing challenges in capturing the monetary and socio-cultural value of ecosystem services and environmental justice considerations.
Summary: In light of the growing need for integrated approaches in addressing contemporary challenges, from climate change mitigation and adaptation to community well-being, our review explores what these research felds can learn from each other and provides recommendations for fostering greater interdisciplinary dialogue and new avenues for collaborations in a meaningful and synergistic manner, aiming to advance policy, research, and practice in agroforestry and urban forestry.
Recent Findings: We emphasize the potential of agroforestry and urban forestry for enhancing multifunctional landscapes. Geographical divides in research are evident, with agroforestry predominantly studied in the Global South and urban forestry receiving more attention in the Global North. However, signifcant research gaps provide avenues for collaboration, for instance, addressing challenges in capturing the monetary and socio-cultural value of ecosystem services and environmental justice considerations.
Summary: In light of the growing need for integrated approaches in addressing contemporary challenges, from climate change mitigation and adaptation to community well-being, our review explores what these research felds can learn from each other and provides recommendations for fostering greater interdisciplinary dialogue and new avenues for collaborations in a meaningful and synergistic manner, aiming to advance policy, research, and practice in agroforestry and urban forestry.
Publisher DOI
ISSN
2198-6436
Volume
10
Publisher
Springer
Submitter
FeurerM
Citation apa
Sousa-Silva, R., Feurer, M., Morhart, C., Sheppard, J. P., Albrecht, S., Anys, M., Beyer, F., Blumenstein, K., Reinecke, S., Seifert, T., Whitehead, I., Pauleit, S., & Bauhus, J. (2024). Seeing the trees without the forest: What and how can agroforestry and urban forestry learn from each other? (Vol. 10). Springer. https://doi.org/10.24451/dspace/11289
File(s)![Thumbnail Image]()
Loading...
open access
Name
Sousa-Silva et al 2024-Seeing the trees without the forest-s40725-024-00221-9.pdf
License
Attribution 4.0 International
Version
published
Size
1.54 MB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
c1eae9a599158542a408c0687b0d7b23
