Noninvasive Electromagnetic Phrenic Nerve Stimulation in Critically Ill Patients
Version
Published
Date Issued
2024-09
Author(s)
Panelli, Alessandro
Grimm, Aline M.
Verfuß, Michael A.
Ulm, Bernhard
Grunow, Julius J.
Bartels, Hermann G.
Carbon, Niklas M.
Weber-Carstens, Steffen
Brochard, Laurent
Schaller, Stefan J.
Type
Article
Language
English
Abstract
Background
Electromagnetic stimulation of the phrenic nerve induces diaphragm contractions, but no coils for clinical use have been available. We recently demonstrated the feasibility of ventilation using bilateral transcutaneous noninvasive electromagnetic phrenic nerve stimulation (NEPNS) before surgery in lung-healthy patients with healthy weight in a dose-dependent manner.
Research Question
Is NEPNS feasible in critically ill patients in an ICU setting?
Study Design and Methods
This feasibility nonrandomized controlled study aimed to enroll patients within 36 h of intubation who were expected to remain ventilated for ≥ 72 h. The intervention group received 15-min bilateral transcutaneous NEPNS bid, whereas the control group received standard care. If sufficient, NEPNS was used without pressure support to ventilate the patient; pressure support was added if necessary to ventilate the patient adequately. The primary outcome was feasibility, measured as time to find the optimal stimulation position. Further end points were sessions performed according to the protocol or allowing a next-day catch-up session and tidal volume achieved with stimulation reaching only 3 to 6 mL/kg ideal body weight (IBW). A secondary end point was expiratory diaphragm thickness measured with ultrasound from days 1 to 10 (or extubation).
Results
The revised European Union regulation mandated reapproval of medical devices, prematurely halting the study. Eleven patients (five in the intervention group, six in the control group) were enrolled. The median time to find an adequate stimulation position was 23 s (interquartile range, 12-62 s). The intervention bid was executed in 87% of patients, and 92% of patients including a next-day catch-up session. Ventilation with 3 to 6 mL/kg IBW was achieved in 732 of 1,701 stimulations (43.0%) with stimulation only and in 2,511 of 4,036 stimulations (62.2%) with additional pressure support. A decrease in diaphragm thickness was prevented by bilateral NEPNS (P = .034) until day 10.
Interpretation
Bilateral transcutaneous NEPNS was feasible in the ICU setting with the potential benefit of preventing diaphragm atrophy during mechanical ventilation. NEPNS ventilation effectiveness needs further assessment.
Electromagnetic stimulation of the phrenic nerve induces diaphragm contractions, but no coils for clinical use have been available. We recently demonstrated the feasibility of ventilation using bilateral transcutaneous noninvasive electromagnetic phrenic nerve stimulation (NEPNS) before surgery in lung-healthy patients with healthy weight in a dose-dependent manner.
Research Question
Is NEPNS feasible in critically ill patients in an ICU setting?
Study Design and Methods
This feasibility nonrandomized controlled study aimed to enroll patients within 36 h of intubation who were expected to remain ventilated for ≥ 72 h. The intervention group received 15-min bilateral transcutaneous NEPNS bid, whereas the control group received standard care. If sufficient, NEPNS was used without pressure support to ventilate the patient; pressure support was added if necessary to ventilate the patient adequately. The primary outcome was feasibility, measured as time to find the optimal stimulation position. Further end points were sessions performed according to the protocol or allowing a next-day catch-up session and tidal volume achieved with stimulation reaching only 3 to 6 mL/kg ideal body weight (IBW). A secondary end point was expiratory diaphragm thickness measured with ultrasound from days 1 to 10 (or extubation).
Results
The revised European Union regulation mandated reapproval of medical devices, prematurely halting the study. Eleven patients (five in the intervention group, six in the control group) were enrolled. The median time to find an adequate stimulation position was 23 s (interquartile range, 12-62 s). The intervention bid was executed in 87% of patients, and 92% of patients including a next-day catch-up session. Ventilation with 3 to 6 mL/kg IBW was achieved in 732 of 1,701 stimulations (43.0%) with stimulation only and in 2,511 of 4,036 stimulations (62.2%) with additional pressure support. A decrease in diaphragm thickness was prevented by bilateral NEPNS (P = .034) until day 10.
Interpretation
Bilateral transcutaneous NEPNS was feasible in the ICU setting with the potential benefit of preventing diaphragm atrophy during mechanical ventilation. NEPNS ventilation effectiveness needs further assessment.
Publisher DOI
Journal
CHEST
ISSN
0012-3692
Volume
166
Issue
3
Publisher
Elsevier
Submitter
Niederhauser, Thomas
Citation apa
Panelli, A., Grimm, A. M., Krause, S., Verfuß, M. A., Ulm, B., Grunow, J. J., Bartels, H. G., Carbon, N. M., Niederhauser, T., Weber-Carstens, S., Brochard, L., & Schaller, S. J. (2024). Noninvasive Electromagnetic Phrenic Nerve Stimulation in Critically Ill Patients. In CHEST (Vol. 166, Issue 3). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.24451/dspace/11308
File(s)![Thumbnail Image]()
Loading...
open access
Name
1-s2.0-S001236922400271X-main-2.pdf
Description
Version published
License
Attribution 4.0 International
Size
623.28 KB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
a6bbb3edf25ff4ddc4cdbedb456ea31a
