Repository logo
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Français
Log In
New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. CRIS
  3. Publication
  4. Streptococcus Group B antepartum culture screening vs. intrapartum PCR rapid test: A meta analysis (Poster)
 

Streptococcus Group B antepartum culture screening vs. intrapartum PCR rapid test: A meta analysis (Poster)

URI
https://arbor.bfh.ch/handle/arbor/46387
Version
Published
Date Issued
2025-12-13
Author(s)
Bill, Olivia
Genier, Sylvie Anne  
Meichtry, André Anton  
Häfliger, Anina
Type
Conference Paper
Language
German
Subjects

Streptococcus Group B...

Bacteriological Techn...

Pregnancy

Sensitivity and Speci...

Polymerase Chain Reac...

Antibiotic

Abstract
Streptococcus agalacticae (Group B Streptococcus, GBS) is a main pathogen causing early onset disease (EOD) in neonates. GBS positive mothers receive
intrapartum antibiotics (IAP) to prevent newborns from EOD. The GBS screening in pregnant mothers is often performed via culture swab testing during the 3rd
trimester (aCulture), or with an intrapartum commercial real-time polymerase chain reaction assay (iPCR). The aim of this study was to analyze the diagnostic
accuracy of the aCulture (gold standard) and iPCR for GBS colonization in pregnant women and conclude implications for clinical practice.

The systematic literature search was conducted on PubMed, Cochrane and Livivo, initially in April 2024 and repeated in February 2025. Studies with publication date between 2012 and 2025 were included if they compared the diagnostic accuracy of aCulture and iPCR (Xpert Xpress GBS) to intrapartum culture as reference standard. All study participants were required to have completed all three tests before inclusion in the analysis. Studies underwent critical appraisal using QUADAS-2 and QUADAS-C. To account for the tradeoff between sensitivity and specificity, we conducted a meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy by fitting a bivariate random-effects model to the true positive and false positive rates. In addition, we fitted univariate random-effects models
for diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), likelihood ratio of a positive (LR + ) and negative test (LR-), respectively. Models were fitted using the `mada` package in R. Four studies were included with a total of 3052 participants (1–4).

For aCulture screening, pooled diagnostic performance was as follows (estimate and 95% CI): Sensitivity (Sn) 0.82 (0.58-0.94), specificity (Sp) 0.97 (0.96-0.98), DOR 140.43 (CI: 62.15-317.27), LR+24.03 (CI: 19.31-29.90) and LR- 0.20 (0.08-0.52). For the iPCR the pooled accuracy was Sn 0.93 (0.90-0.95), Sp 0.97 (0.94-0.99), DOR 661.19 (432.11-1011.71), LR+31.48 (13.72-72.20) and LR- 0.09 (0.07-0.11).

Both tests met the 95% specificity threshold, but aCulture fell short of the 90% sensitivity requirement. iPCR showed a significantly lower LR−, indicating better ability to rule out GBS. Consequently, iPCR demonstrates superior diagnostic accuracy and greater prophylactic value in managing IAP to reduce vertical GBS transmission during labor. Its timely bed-side results support more precise antibiotic use, potentially lowering antimicrobial resistance. However, the lack
of susceptibility testing limits a full shift from antenatal culture to iPCR screening. A combined approach may be feasible, with iPCR as the standard and
aCulture especially for patients with antibiotic allergies.
Subjects
RG Gynecology and obstetrics
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24451/arbor.12741
Publisher URL
https://dgpm-kongress.de/
Related URL
https://dgpm-kongress.de/
Organization
Geburtshilfe  
Gesundheit  
Conference
32. Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Perinatale Medizin (DGPM)
Submitter
Durrer, Annalena Maria
Citation apa
Bill, O., Genier, S. A., Meichtry, A. A., & Häfliger, A. (2025). Streptococcus Group B antepartum culture screening vs. intrapartum PCR rapid test: A meta analysis (Poster). 32. Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Perinatale Medizin (DGPM). https://doi.org/10.24451/arbor.12741
Note
Artikel (Abstract) und Poster wurden separat erfasst.
File(s)
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Download

open access

Name

Bill_Genier_et al_2025_Poster_GBS.pdf

License
Publisher
Version
presentation
Size

290.26 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

19dc75b4a2659c980dde76eaedfe4ca6

About ARBOR

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - System hosted and mantained by 4Science

  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback
  • Our institution