Influence of charging losses on energy consumption and CO2 emissions of battery electric vehicles
Version
Published
Date Issued
2021-11-04
Author(s)
Type
Article
Language
English
Abstract
Due to increasing sales figures, the energy consumption of battery-electric vehicles is moving further into focus. In addition to efficient driving, it is also important that the energy losses during AC charging are as low as possible for a sustainable operation. In many situations it is not possible or necessary to charge the vehicle with the maximum charging power e.g. in
apartment buildings. The influence of the charging mode (number of phases used, in-cable control-box or used wallbox, charging current) on the charging efficiency is often unknown. In this work, the energy consumption of two electric vehicles in the Worldwide Harmonised Light-Duty Vehicles Test Cycle is presented. In-house developed measurement technology and vehicle CAN data is used. A detailed breakdown of charging losses, drivetrain efficiency, and overall energy consumption for one of the vehicles is provided. Finally, the results are discussed with reference to avoidable CO2 emissions. The charging losses of the tested vehicles range from 12,79 to 20,42 %. Maximum charging power with three phases and 16 A charging current delivers the best efficiencies. Single-phase charging was considered up to 10 A, where the losses are greatest. The drivetrain efficiency while driving is 63.88 % on average for the WLTC, 77,12 % in the "extra high" section and 23,12 % in the "low" section. The resulting energy consumption for both vehicles is higher than the OEM data given (21,6 to 44,9 %). Explanations for this are given. Over 100.000 km, unfavorable charging results in additional CO2 emissions of 1,24 t. The emissions are three times larger than for a class A+ refrigerator with an annual mileage of 20.000 km. A classification of charging modes and chargers thus appears to make sense. In the following work, efficiency
improvements in the charger as well as DC charging will be illuminated.
apartment buildings. The influence of the charging mode (number of phases used, in-cable control-box or used wallbox, charging current) on the charging efficiency is often unknown. In this work, the energy consumption of two electric vehicles in the Worldwide Harmonised Light-Duty Vehicles Test Cycle is presented. In-house developed measurement technology and vehicle CAN data is used. A detailed breakdown of charging losses, drivetrain efficiency, and overall energy consumption for one of the vehicles is provided. Finally, the results are discussed with reference to avoidable CO2 emissions. The charging losses of the tested vehicles range from 12,79 to 20,42 %. Maximum charging power with three phases and 16 A charging current delivers the best efficiencies. Single-phase charging was considered up to 10 A, where the losses are greatest. The drivetrain efficiency while driving is 63.88 % on average for the WLTC, 77,12 % in the "extra high" section and 23,12 % in the "low" section. The resulting energy consumption for both vehicles is higher than the OEM data given (21,6 to 44,9 %). Explanations for this are given. Over 100.000 km, unfavorable charging results in additional CO2 emissions of 1,24 t. The emissions are three times larger than for a class A+ refrigerator with an annual mileage of 20.000 km. A classification of charging modes and chargers thus appears to make sense. In the following work, efficiency
improvements in the charger as well as DC charging will be illuminated.
Subjects
TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery
TK Electrical engineering. Electronics Nuclear engineering
TL Motor vehicles. Aeronautics. Astronautics
Publisher DOI
Journal or Serie
MDPI - Vehicles
Organization
IEM / Fahrzeugelektronik
IEM / Labor für Antriebsysteme und Emissionen
Institut für Energie- und Mobilitätsforschung IEM
Technik und Informatik
Volume
3
Issue
4
Publisher
MDPI
Submitter
Engelmann, Danilo
Citation apa
Reick, B., Konzept, A., Kaufmann, A., Stetter, R., & Engelmann, D. (2021). Influence of charging losses on energy consumption and CO2 emissions of battery electric vehicles. In MDPI - Vehicles (Vol. 3, Issue 4, pp. 736–748). MDPI. https://doi.org/10.24451/arbor.15612
