Repository logo
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Français
Log In
New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. CRIS
  3. Publication
  4. Impact of guided self-study on learning success in undergraduate physiotherapy students in Switzerland – a feasibility study of a higher education intervention
 

Impact of guided self-study on learning success in undergraduate physiotherapy students in Switzerland – a feasibility study of a higher education intervention

URI
https://arbor.bfh.ch/handle/arbor/43596
Version
Published
Date Issued
2021-06-29
Author(s)
Rogan, Slavko  
Taeymans, Jan  
Zuber, Stefan  
Zinzen, Evert
Type
Article
Language
English
Abstract
Background
Guided self-study (G-SS) can be used as a self-directed learning method or self-determined learning that fosters changes in knowledge and skills in a higher physiotherapy education setting. Until now, there has been no empirical evidence for the use of G-SS in higher physiotherapy education. This study aimed to investigate the feasibility to establish a G-SS program in a fulltime undergraduate physiotherapy degree course. In addition, the effectiveness of the G-SS was assessed on changes in knowledge and skills.

Method
Fifty-one first-semester physiotherapy students were randomly divided into a G-SS group or control group (CG). The G-SS group received six clinical cases. Each case was processed in an eight-day cycle. One week in advance, the clinical case were provided to the students electronically (day 1). The students prepared the cases in groups and were guided by the tutor during this preparation time (day 2 to 7). Group work results were presented and reflected on during a moderated plenum session at day 8. A priori criteria of success were defined based on empirical experience for the primary outcome parameters i) exposure, ii) responsiveness of students and iii) program differentiation. The secondary outcome was the total score in the objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) and written exams. Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS.

Results
The responsiveness of students as willing to participate in the G-SS program was 23%, clearly below the a priori set 83%. No differences in program differentiation were found. G-SS as compared to the CG scored significantly better on OSCE (p = 0.003) and on the written exam (p = 0.004).

Conclusion
The results showed that this higher education G-SS program in its current form was not feasible. Slight modification of the study protocol (e.g. better time planning in the academic calendar) is needed to improve the student’s responsiveness. The adjustments to the timetable must allow the physiotherapy students to prepare the clinical cases under conditions of lower workload. G-SS has the potential to promote change in knowledge and skills in undergraduate physiotherapy students when students prepare and present the clinical case solutions and reflect upon their actions.
Subjects
L Education (General)
LB2300 Higher Education
DOI
10.24451/arbor.16305
https://doi.org/10.24451/arbor.16305
Publisher DOI
10.1186/s12909-021-02794-6
Journal or Serie
BMC Medical Education
ISSN
1472-6920
Publisher URL
https://bmcmededuc.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12909-021-02794-6
Organization
Hochschulbildung bei Gesundheitsberufen  
Physiotherapie  
Gesundheit  
Volume
21
Issue
362
Publisher
Springer
Submitter
Rogan, Slavko
Citation apa
Rogan, S., Taeymans, J., Zuber, S., & Zinzen, E. (2021). Impact of guided self-study on learning success in undergraduate physiotherapy students in Switzerland – a feasibility study of a higher education intervention. In BMC Medical Education (Vol. 21, Issue 362, pp. 1–8). Springer. https://doi.org/10.24451/arbor.16305
File(s)
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Download

open access

Name

Rogan et al.guided SST_2021.pdf

License
Attribution 4.0 International
Version
published
Size

764.43 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

838aee0927b6cefff49c50e9efb143a6

About ARBOR

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - System hosted and mantained by 4Science

  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback
  • Our institution