Repository logo
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Français
Log In
New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. CRIS
  3. Publication
  4. Physical therapists’ perspectives and practices on weight management for chronic pain patients with obesity: a cross-sectional survey
 

Physical therapists’ perspectives and practices on weight management for chronic pain patients with obesity: a cross-sectional survey

URI
https://arbor.bfh.ch/handle/arbor/46077
Version
Published
Identifiers
10.33393/aop.2025.3590
Date Issued
2025-12-01
Author(s)
Liechti, Melanie Nadia  
Menegon, Massimo
Schurz, Alexander Philipp  
Vanroose, Matteo
Clijsen, Ron  
Malfliet, Anneleen
Fäh, David  
Baur, Heiner  
Taeymans, Jan  
Lutz, Nathanael  
Type
Article
Language
English
Subjects

Chronic pain

Lifestyle

Obesity

Physical therapy

Weight management

Abstract
Introduction: Overweight and obesity management in primary care gained importance due to its global rise and association with cardiometabolic diseases and chronic musculoskeletal disorders (MSD). Physical therapists are well-positioned to incorporate weight management in their practice. This survey evaluates attitudes, barriers and clinical practices of physical therapists regarding weight management for individuals with chronic pain and comorbid overweight or obesity.
Methods: German-speaking physical therapists in Switzerland volunteered in an online survey. Descriptive statistics summarized physical therapists’ attitudes, barriers and practices. Logistic regression analyses identified factors associated with recommending and implementing weight reduction interventions.
Results: Of the 581 respondents, 92.1% acknowledged the importance of educating patients on obesity-related health risks, and 81.6% recommended weight reduction. Two-thirds offered weight reduction interventions in physical therapy, although fewer (57.3%) received corresponding training during entry-level education. Most weight reduction interventions focused on movement, endurance, and strength, whilst a minority addressed nutrition, sleep or stress. The odds of offering weight reduction interventions were higher among those with entry-level education (OR: 2.1, 95% CI: 1.4-3.3), further education (OR: 1.9, 95% CI: 1.1-3.3), and for those who perceived weight reduction interventions (OR: 6.5, 95% CI: 3.5-12.3) and counseling on other lifestyle factors (OR: 2.9, 95% CI: 1.2-7.3) as within their professional scope.
Conclusions: While physical therapists showed positive attitudes toward weight reduction interventions for individuals with chronic pain and overweight or obesity, their education and implementation remain inconsistent, primarily focusing on improving physical activity. Clear competencies and structured training are needed to integrate evidence-based weight management into clinical practice.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24451/arbor.12508
Publisher DOI
10.33393/aop.2025.3590
Journal or Serie
Archives of Physiotherapy
ISSN
2057-0082
Publisher URL
https://www.archivesofphysiotherapy.com/index.php/aop/article/view/3590
Organization
Gesundheit  
Physiotherapie  
Public Health und physiotherapiebezogene Gesundheitsökonomie  
Volume
15
Issue
1
Publisher
BioMed Central Ltd.
Submitter
Liechti, Melanie Nadia
Citation apa
Liechti, M. N., Menegon, M., Schurz, A. P., Vanroose, M., Clijsen, R., Malfliet, A., Fäh, D., Baur, H., Taeymans, J., & Lutz, N. (2025). Physical therapists’ perspectives and practices on weight management for chronic pain patients with obesity: a cross-sectional survey. In Archives of Physiotherapy (Vol. 15, Issue 1, pp. 286–296). BioMed Central Ltd. https://doi.org/10.24451/arbor.12508
File(s)
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Download

open access

Name

Liechti et al_2025_AoP.pdf

License
Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
Version
published
Size

1.09 MB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

efee51eae9964511a337ce917bc54ccb

About ARBOR

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - System hosted and mantained by 4Science

  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback
  • Our institution