The extended gentle caesarean section protocol—expanding the scope and adding value for the family: a cross‑sectional study
Version
Published
Date Issued
2023-01-16
Author(s)
Type
Article
Language
English
Abstract
Purpose In Switzerland, about one in three children is born by caesarean section (CS). For many women, this means a restricted birth experience, limited observation of the birth process and a restricted involvement. We evaluated an extended gentle CS protocol, which offered early intraoperative skin-to-skin contact and the possibility of observing the delivery of the baby from the abdomen through a transparent drape.
Methods This is a cross-sectional study incorporating data from a purposely tailored
questionnaire and clinical routine data.The extended gentle CS protocol was compared with the gentle CS, which does not allow the possibility of observing the delivery. Data were collected online and analysed by multivariable regression for quantitative data and content analysis for all text responses to open questions, respectively.
Results 193 women completed the questionnaire. Of these, 154 had a gentle CS and 39 had an extended gentle CS. Multivariable regression did not reveal a statistically significant difference for extended gentle CS with regard to satisfaction with childbirth, mother-to-child bonding, or breastfeeding duration. Nevertheless, early intraoperative skin-to-skin contact
was associated with the fulfilment of birth expectations. Furthermore, most women who experienced an extended gentle CS would prefer the same procedure for any potential future CS.
Conclusions Although our study showed no statistically significant difference in satisfaction from using a transparent drape, most women expressed a preference for this technique. We recommend that the option of an extended gentle CS should be offered to all women for whom CS is indicated.
Methods This is a cross-sectional study incorporating data from a purposely tailored
questionnaire and clinical routine data.The extended gentle CS protocol was compared with the gentle CS, which does not allow the possibility of observing the delivery. Data were collected online and analysed by multivariable regression for quantitative data and content analysis for all text responses to open questions, respectively.
Results 193 women completed the questionnaire. Of these, 154 had a gentle CS and 39 had an extended gentle CS. Multivariable regression did not reveal a statistically significant difference for extended gentle CS with regard to satisfaction with childbirth, mother-to-child bonding, or breastfeeding duration. Nevertheless, early intraoperative skin-to-skin contact
was associated with the fulfilment of birth expectations. Furthermore, most women who experienced an extended gentle CS would prefer the same procedure for any potential future CS.
Conclusions Although our study showed no statistically significant difference in satisfaction from using a transparent drape, most women expressed a preference for this technique. We recommend that the option of an extended gentle CS should be offered to all women for whom CS is indicated.
Subjects
RG Gynecology and obstetrics
Publisher DOI
Journal
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
ISSN
0003-9128
Publisher URL
Volume
307
Issue
5
Publisher
Springer
Submitter
SchmittK
Citation apa
Christoph, P., Aebi, J., Sutter, L., Schmitt, K.-U., Surbek, D., & Oelhafen, S. (2023). The extended gentle caesarean section protocol—expanding the scope and adding value for the family: a cross‑sectional study. In Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics (Vol. 307, Issue 5). Springer. https://doi.org/10.24451/arbor.18743
File(s)![Thumbnail Image]()
Loading...
open access
Name
christoph-cesarian-section-2023.pdf
License
Attribution 4.0 International
Version
published
Size
819.94 KB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
ba952c0db9fe02c3ed266c7ceed16117
