Repository logo
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Français
Log In
New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. CRIS
  3. Publication
  4. Separating the wheat from the chaff: How to measure hospital quality in routine data?
 

Separating the wheat from the chaff: How to measure hospital quality in routine data?

URI
https://arbor.bfh.ch/handle/arbor/36840
Version
Published
Date Issued
2024-01-22
Author(s)
Bilger, Jana Franziska  
Pletscher, Mark
Müller, Tobias  
Type
Article
Language
English
Subjects

Hospital Machine lear...

Abstract
Objective
To measure hospital quality based on routine data available in many health care systems including the United States, Germany, the United Kingdom, Scandinavia, and Switzerland.

Data Sources and Study Setting
We use the Swiss Medical Statistics of Hospitals, an administrative hospital dataset of all inpatient stays in acute care hospitals in Switzerland for the years 2017–2019.

Study Design
We study hospital quality based on quality indicators used by leading agencies in five countries (the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, Austria, and Switzerland) for two high-volume elective procedures: inguinal hernia repair and hip replacement surgery. We assess how least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), a supervised machine learning technique for variable selection, and Mundlak corrections that account for unobserved heterogeneity between hospitals can be used to improve risk adjustment and correct for imbalances in patient risks across hospitals.

Data Collection/Extraction Methods
The Swiss Federal Statistical Office collects annual data on all acute care inpatient stays including basic socio-demographic patient attributes and case-level diagnosis and procedure codes.

Principal Findings
We find that LASSO-selected and Mundlak-corrected hospital random effects logit models outperform common practice logistic regression models used for risk adjustment. Besides the more favorable statistical properties, they have superior in- and out-of-sample explanatory power. Moreover, we find that Mundlak-corrected logits and the more complex LASSO-selected models identify the same hospitals as high or low-quality offering public health authorities a valuable alternative to standard logistic regression models. Our analysis shows that hospitals vary considerably in the quality they provide to patients.

Conclusion
We find that routine hospital data can be used to measure clinically relevant quality indicators that help patients make informed hospital choices.
Subjects
H Social Sciences (General)
R Medicine (General)
DOI
10.24451/arbor.21234
https://doi.org/10.24451/arbor.21234
Publisher DOI
10.1111/1475-6773.14282
Journal or Serie
Health Services Research
ISSN
0017-9124
Publisher URL
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/
Related URL
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/14756773 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1475-6773.14282
Organization
Gesundheit  
Institut für Gesundheitsökonomie und Gesundheitspolitik  
Sponsors
SWICA
Volume
59
Issue
2
Publisher
Wiley Online Library
Submitter
Müller, Tobias Benjamin
Citation apa
Bilger, J. F., Pletscher, M., & Müller, T. (2024). Separating the wheat from the chaff: How to measure hospital quality in routine data? In Health Services Research (Vol. 59, Issue 2, pp. 1–10). Wiley Online Library. https://doi.org/10.24451/arbor.21234
File(s)
Loading...
Thumbnail Image

restricted

Name

Bilger et al. 2024.pdf

License
Publisher
Version
published
Size

1.19 MB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

57c18100099f18808033064c259a0199

About ARBOR

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - System hosted and mantained by 4Science

  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback
  • Our institution