Repository logo
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Français
Log In
New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. CRIS
  3. Publication
  4. Carcass and meat quality of dual-purpose chickens (Lohmann Dual, Belgian Malines, Schweizerhuhn) in comparison to broiler and layer chicken types
 

Carcass and meat quality of dual-purpose chickens (Lohmann Dual, Belgian Malines, Schweizerhuhn) in comparison to broiler and layer chicken types

URI
https://arbor.bfh.ch/handle/arbor/39821
Version
Published
Date Issued
2018
Author(s)
Mueller, S
Kreuzer, M
Siegrist, M
Mannale, K
Messikommer, R.E.
Gangnat, Isabelle Diane Marie  
Type
Article
Language
English
Subjects

carcass conformation

chicken type

culling

dual-purpose

growth performance

Abstract
Currently, there is an intensive ethical discussion about the practice of culling day-old layer cockerels. One solution to avoid this practice could be using dual-purpose types, where males are fattened for meat and females used for egg production. The aim of the present study was to compare fattening performance, carcass conformation, and composition as well as meat quality of Lohmann Dual, a novel dual-purpose type, and 2 traditional dual-purpose types (Belgian Malines and Schweizerhuhn) with 2 broiler types and 1 layer type (Lohmann Brown Plus). Broilers included a conventional line (Ross PM3) and a slower-growing line (Sasso 51) fulfilling requirements of organic farming. Nine birds of each type were fed on a conventional broiler diet. Feed intake and metabolizability of nitrogen and energy were recorded per pen (n = 3), the latter through excreta sampling. For each bird, carcass conformation was assessed, and weights of body, carcass, breast meat, legs, wings, and inner organs were determined. Additionally, breast angle, an indicator for carcass appeal, and skin color were recorded. Meat quality assessment included determinations of thaw and cooking loss, shear force, meat color, and proximate composition of the breast meat. None of the dualpurpose types (20 to 30 g ADG) performed as well in growth as the intensively growing broiler line (68 g ADG). However, Lohmann Dual could compete with the slower-growing broiler line (slower growth but better feed efficiency, similar in carcass weight and breast proportion). Also breast angle was quite similar between Lohmann Dual (100◦) and the extensive broiler type (115◦C) compared to the intensive broiler line (180◦). Meat quality was most favorable in the intensive broilers with the smallest shear force and thawing loss, whereas meat quality was not different between the other types. The Schweizerhuhn performed only at the level of the layer hybrid, and the Belgian Malines was ranked only lightly better.
Subjects
SF Animal culture
DOI
10.24451/arbor.16070
https://doi.org/10.24451/arbor.16070
Publisher DOI
10.3382/ps/pey172
Journal or Serie
Poultry Science
ISSN
00325791
Publisher URL
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S003257911930879X?via%3Dihub
Organization
Hochschule für Agrar-, Forst- und Lebensmittelwissenschaften  
Agronomie  
Nutziere und Pferde  
Ressourceneffiziente landwirtschaftliche Produktionssysteme  
Volume
97
Issue
9
Publisher
Elsevier
Submitter
GangnatI
Citation apa
Mueller, S., Kreuzer, M., Siegrist, M., Mannale, K., Messikommer, R. E., & Gangnat, I. D. M. (2018). Carcass and meat quality of dual-purpose chickens (Lohmann Dual, Belgian Malines, Schweizerhuhn) in comparison to broiler and layer chicken types. In Poultry Science (Vol. 97, Issue 9, pp. 3325–3336). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.24451/arbor.16070
File(s)
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Download

open access

Name

Mueller_2018. Carcass and meat quality of dual-purpose chickens (Lohmann Dual, Belgian Malines, Schweizerhuhn) in comparison to broiler and layer chicken types.pdf

License
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Version
published
Size

425.08 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

aa18814ac7526dc8b663dad291e3d2d0

About ARBOR

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - System hosted and mantained by 4Science

  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback
  • Our institution