Repository logo
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Français
Log In
New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. CRIS
  3. Publication
  4. Artificial intelligence in nursing and midwifery: A systematic review
 

Artificial intelligence in nursing and midwifery: A systematic review

URI
https://arbor.bfh.ch/handle/arbor/34749
Version
Published
Date Issued
2022-07-31
Author(s)
O'Connor, Siobhán
Yan, Yongyang
Thilo, Friederike J.S.  
Felzmann, Heike
Dowding, Dawn
Lee, Jung Jae
Type
Article
Language
English
Abstract
Background:
Artificial Intelligence (AI) techniques are being applied in nursing and midwifery to improve decision-making, patient care and service delivery. However, an understanding of the real-world applications of AI across all domains of both professions is limited.
Objectives:
To synthesise literature on AI in nursing and midwifery.
Methods:
CINAHL, Embase, PubMed and Scopus were searched using relevant terms. Titles, abstracts and full texts were screened against eligibility criteria. Data were extracted, analysed, and findings were presented in a descriptive summary. The PRISMA checklist guided the review conduct and reporting.
Results:
One hundred and forty articles were included. Nurses’ and midwives' involvement in AI varied, with some taking an active role in testing, using or evaluating AI-based technologies; however, many studies did not include either profession. AI was mainly applied in clinical practice to direct patient care (n = 115, 82.14%), with fewer studies focusing on administration and management (n = 21, 15.00%), or education (n = 4, 2.85%). Benefits reported were primarily potential as most studies trained and tested AI algorithms. Only a handful (n = 8, 7.14%) reported actual benefits when AI techniques were applied in real-world settings. Risks and limitations included poor quality datasets that could introduce bias, the need for clinical interpretation of AI-based results, privacy and trust issues, and inadequate AI expertise among the professions.
Conclusion:
Digital health datasets should be put in place to support the testing, use, and evaluation of AI in nursing and midwifery. Curricula need to be developed to educate the professions about AI, so they can lead and participate in these digital initiatives in healthcare. Relevance for clinical practice: Adult, paediatric, mental health and learning disability nurses, along with midwives should have a more active role in rigorous, interdisciplinary research evaluating AI-based technologies in professional practice to determine their clinical efficacy as well as their ethical, legal and social implications in healthcare.
Subjects
RT Nursing
T Technology (General)
DOI
10.24451/arbor.18313
https://doi.org/10.24451/arbor.18313
Publisher DOI
10.1111/jocn.16478
Journal or Serie
Journal of Clinical Nursing
ISSN
0962-1067
Publisher URL
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jocn.16478
Organization
Gesundheit  
G / Innovationsfeld Technologie und Gesundheit  
Pflege  
Volume
32
Issue
13-14
Project(s)
2021-426-308-264
Publisher
Wiley-Blackwell
Submitter
Thilo, Friederike J.S.
Citation apa
O’Connor, S., Yan, Y., Thilo, F. J. S., Felzmann, H., Dowding, D., & Lee, J. J. (2022). Artificial intelligence in nursing and midwifery: A systematic review. In Journal of Clinical Nursing (Vol. 32, Issues 13–14, pp. 2951–2968). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.24451/arbor.18313
File(s)
Loading...
Thumbnail Image

restricted

Name

Artificial intelligence in nursing and midwifery a systematic review_JCN 2022.pdf

License
Publisher
Version
published
Size

1.39 MB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

e51b2d4d0e585b9ef6bd2c081a558af4

About ARBOR

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - System hosted and mantained by 4Science

  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback
  • Our institution