Repository logo
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Français
Log In
New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. CRIS
  3. Publication
  4. Efficacy of Thoracolumbar Bracing in Spinal Immobilization : Precise Assessment of Gross, Intersegmental, and Segmental Spinal Motion Restriction by a 3D Kinematic System
 

Efficacy of Thoracolumbar Bracing in Spinal Immobilization : Precise Assessment of Gross, Intersegmental, and Segmental Spinal Motion Restriction by a 3D Kinematic System

URI
https://arbor.bfh.ch/handle/arbor/39744
Version
Published
Date Issued
2018
Author(s)
Langenbacher, Gernot
Hirschmüller, Anja
Patermann, Stefanie
Eichelberger, Patric  
Strohm, Peter
Baur, Heiner  
Südkamp, Norbert P.
Herget, Georg W.
Type
Article
Language
English
Abstract
Background

Various diseases of the spine are treated by immobilization via orthoses, although detailed evidence on the efficiency of orthotic bracing remains elusive. The present study sought to investigate the impact of 3 different orthoses on spinal immobilization using 3-dimensional (3D) kinematic measurements.

Methods

Twelve healthy volunteers performed different motion tasks, including trunk flexion/extension and bilateral trunk bending. Movements were performed under 4 different conditions: 1) without orthosis, 2) while wearing a 3-point hyperextension brace (HB), 3) while wearing a custom-made semirigid orthosis (SO), and 4) while wearing a custom-made rigid orthosis (RO). Spinal motion was analyzed using a 3D optical motion capture system assessing regional, intersegmental, and segmental range of motion (ROM).

Results

Assessment of spinal motion was successfully accomplished in all subjects. Overall, orthoses significantly reduced spinal motion compared with no bracing. RO caused the greatest restriction of regional, intersegmental, and segmental spinal motion among all orthoses. For flexion/extension, the mean percentage decreases between T3 and L5 in full active ROM with HB, SO, and RO compared with no orthosis were 38%/30%, 48%/47%, and 51%/55%, respectively (P ≤ 0.05). Lateral bending was impaired by 28%, 44%, and 70%, respectively (P ≤ 0.05). Assessment of lateral bending revealed greater immobilization by SO and RO compared with HB (P ≤ 0.05).

Conclusions

The present 3D kinematic system allows for precise assessment of spinal motion. Custom-made orthoses cause superior restriction on gross spinal motion compared “off-the-shelf” orthoses. If orthotic bracing is indicated, design, comfort, and patient compliance need to be carefully considered to guarantee successful therapy.

Key words

Bracing
Degeneration
Metastasis
Orthosis
Spine
Trauma

Abbreviations and Acronyms

3D3-dimensional
CAD/CAMComputer-aided design/manufacturing
HBHyperextension brace
LSOLumbosacral orthosis
OTSOff the shelf
RORigid orthosis
ROMRange of motion
SOSemirigid orthosis
TLSOThoracolumbar sacral orthosis
DOI
10.24451/arbor.6751
https://doi.org/10.24451/arbor.6751
Publisher DOI
10.1016/j.wneu.2018.04.133
Journal
World Neurosurgery
ISSN
2590-1397
Organization
Gesundheit  
Physiotherapie  
Fussbiomechanik und Technologie  
Neuromuskuläre Kontrolle  
Volume
116
Publisher
Elsevier
Submitter
ServiceAccount
Citation apa
Langenbacher, G., Hirschmüller, A., Patermann, S., Eichelberger, P., Strohm, P., Baur, H., Südkamp, N. P., & Herget, G. W. (2018). Efficacy of Thoracolumbar Bracing in Spinal Immobilization : Precise Assessment of Gross, Intersegmental, and Segmental Spinal Motion Restriction by a 3D Kinematic System. In World Neurosurgery (Vol. 116). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.24451/arbor.6751
File(s)
Loading...
Thumbnail Image

restricted

Name

Efficacy of Thoracolumbar Bracing in Spinal Immobilization.pdf

License
Publisher
Version
published
Size

1.6 MB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

6289e5261bbf31002a8cde0c32e6265c

About ARBOR

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - System hosted and mantained by 4Science

  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback
  • Our institution