Märtyrer oder Leichen? Das Hirntodkriterium als Topos theologischer Medizinethik.
Version
Published
Date Issued
2006
Author(s)
Type
Article
Language
German
Abstract
The whole brain criterion of death has been the subject of intense theological debate since the process of policy shaping fortheGerman transplantation law adopted in 1997. This article identifies tutiorism as the predominant argumentative strategy both for the theological defence and the rejection of a neurological criterion of death. A tutioristic argumentation fails to elucidate the very nature of the problern which is normative and tends to clarify rights and duties of all the actors involved in the clinical setting of organ transplant or withdrawal of life sustaining therapies. A theological defence of the whole brain criterion of death has to avoid that distinctions between life and death become blurred. On the other hand, those who reject this criterion, but still support the current practice of organ transplant, have to be aware that this option is hardly compatible with most part of the moral tradition of Christianity.
Subjects
BJ Ethics
BL Religion
BR Christianity
R Medicine (General)
Journal or Serie
Zeitschrift für Evangelische Ethik
ISSN
0044-2674
Organization
Volume
50
Submitter
Monteverde, Settimio
Citation apa
Monteverde, S. (2006). Märtyrer oder Leichen? Das Hirntodkriterium als Topos theologischer Medizinethik. In Zeitschrift für Evangelische Ethik (Vol. 50, pp. 182–196). https://doi.org/10.24451/arbor.12157
File(s)![Thumbnail Image]()
Loading...
restricted
Name
Märtyrer oder Leichen.pdf
License
Publisher
Version
published
Size
1.32 MB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
5b40f7eb9a9a05a3080e209beebd861b
