Repository logo
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Français
Log In
New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. CRIS
  3. Publication
  4. Effects of different sources and spatial resolutions of environmental covariates on predicting soil organic carbon using machine learning in a semi-arid region of Iran
 

Effects of different sources and spatial resolutions of environmental covariates on predicting soil organic carbon using machine learning in a semi-arid region of Iran

URI
https://arbor.bfh.ch/handle/arbor/34225
Version
Published
Date Issued
2022-06
Author(s)
Garosi, Younes
Ayoubi, Shamsollah
Nussbaum, Madlene  
Sheklabadi, Mohsen
Type
Article
Language
English
Subjects

Covariate

Pixel size

Different data source...

Entisols

Inceptisols

Uncertainty

Abstract
The main goal of this study was to consider and compare the effects of different spatial resolutions of covariates from different sources on predicting SOC in a semi-arid region located in the west of Iran. For this purpose, 67 topsoil samples (0–30 cm) with the measured SOC contents were used as the dependent variable. The covariates controlling the SOC content from different sources were provided in two scenarios. For the first scenario (scenario I), six covariate sets with spatial resolution ranging from 2 to 30 m, and original and aggregated pixel sizes were prepared using the digital elevation models (DEMs) and remote sensing data to predict SOC. In the second scenario (scenario II), the available legacy data, including geology, land use and soil texture maps, were prepared with compatible spatial resolution and added to each covariate set provided for scenario I. After feature selection analysis, the modelling processes were performed using two machine learning models, namely, Random Forest (RF) and Support Vector Machine (SVM). The results of performance analysis, as obtained by leave one out cross validation (LOOCV), showed that the RF and covariate set B (with 10 m spatial resolution) in scenario I, with R2 = 0.21, CCC = 0.41, MAE = 0.26 and RMSE = 0.34%, and also, in scenario II, with R2 = 0.32, CCC = 0.51, MAE = 0.24, and RMSE = 0.32%, had a better performance in predicting SOC. In addition, the remote sensing data were identified as the most important variables controlling the spatial distribution of SOC. Finally, by using the RF model as the superior model, the SOC map provided by the covariate set B in scenario II, which was the combination of the three types of covariates (DEM, remote sensing data and legacy data), was shown to have the lowest uncertainty in comparison to the SOC provided by the covariate set B in scenario I. In general, our results showed that the model type, source, resolution and the combination of these variables could greatly influence the prediction outputs. In fact, the SOC map provided with the combination of parsimonious variables at the optimal pixel size could help decision-making in environmental resources management.
Subjects
GA Mathematical geography. Cartography
S Agriculture (General)
DOI
10.24451/arbor.17883
https://doi.org/10.24451/arbor.17883
Publisher DOI
10.1016/j.geodrs.2022.e00513
Journal or Serie
Geoderma Regional
ISSN
23520094
Publisher URL
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352009422000335?via%3Dihub
Organization
Hochschule für Agrar-, Forst- und Lebensmittelwissenschaften  
Agronomie  
Boden und Geoinformation  
Volume
29
Publisher
Elsevier
Submitter
NussbaumM
Citation apa
Garosi, Y., Ayoubi, S., Nussbaum, M., & Sheklabadi, M. (2022). Effects of different sources and spatial resolutions of environmental covariates on predicting soil organic carbon using machine learning in a semi-arid region of Iran. In Geoderma Regional (Vol. 29). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.24451/arbor.17883
File(s)
Loading...
Thumbnail Image

restricted

Name

1-s2.0-S2352009422000335-main.pdf

License
Publisher
Version
published
Size

5.33 MB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

ed67f70ef368bb99ede8b7f85c071043

About ARBOR

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - System hosted and mantained by 4Science

  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback
  • Our institution