Competing Institutional Logics and Paradoxical Universalism: School-to-Work Transitions of Disabled Youth in Switzerland and the United States

Tschanz, Christoph; Powell, Justin J. W. (2020). Competing Institutional Logics and Paradoxical Universalism: School-to-Work Transitions of Disabled Youth in Switzerland and the United States Social Inclusion, 8(1), pp. 155-167. Cogitatio Press 10.17645/si.v8i1.2373

[img]
Preview
Text
Tschanz_Powell_2020.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY).

Download (324kB) | Preview

Disablement is a complex social phenomenon in contemporary societies, reflected in disability policies oriented towards contrasting paradigms. Fraught with ambivalence, disability raises dilemmas of classification and targeted supports. Paradoxical universalism emphasizes that to achieve universality requires recognizing individual dis/abilities and particular contextual conditions and barriers that disable. Myriad aspects of educational and disability policies challenge both conceptualization and realization of universal policies, such as compulsory schooling, with widespread exclusion or segregation prevalent. Resulting tensions between providing support and ubiquitous stigmatization and separation are endemic, and particularly evident during life course transitions that imply shifting memberships in institutions and organizations. Particularly visible among disabled youth, school-to-work transitions are fundamentally challenged by contrasting policies, institutional logics, and institutionalized organizations. Analyzing institutional logics facilitates understanding of the lack of coordination that hinders successful transitions. Examining such challenges in the United States and Switzerland, we compare their labor markets and federal governance structures and contrasting education, welfare, and employment systems. Whereas lacking inter-institutional coordination negatively impacts disabled young adults in the United States, Switzerland’s robust vocational education and training system, while not a panacea, does provide more coordinated support during school-to-work transitions. These two countries provide relevant cases to examine ambivalence and contestation around the human right to inclusive education as well as the universality of the right (not) to work.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

School of Social Work > Institute for Social Security and Social Policy
School of Social Work

Name:

Tschanz, Christoph0000-0003-4686-4659 and
Powell, Justin J. W.

Subjects:

H Social Sciences > HM Sociology
H Social Sciences > HN Social history and conditions. Social problems. Social reform

ISSN:

2183-2803

Publisher:

Cogitatio Press

Language:

English

Submitter:

Christoph Tschanz

Date Deposited:

15 Feb 2023 08:42

Last Modified:

15 Feb 2023 08:42

Publisher DOI:

10.17645/si.v8i1.2373

Uncontrolled Keywords:

comparative education; comparative social policy; disability; disability policy; education; educational policy; institutions; institutional logics; organizations; school-to-work transitions

ARBOR DOI:

10.24451/arbor.18712

URI:

https://arbor.bfh.ch/id/eprint/18712

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
Provide Feedback