Tierney, Warren; Hardy, Jay; Ebersole, Charles R.; Viganola, Domenico; Clemente, Elena Giulia; Gordon, Michael; Hoogeveen, Suzanne; Haaf, Julia; Dreber, Anna; Johannesson, Magnus; Pfeiffer, Thomas; Huang, Jason L.; Vaughn, Leigh Ann; DeMarree, Kenneth; Igou, Eric; Chapman, Hanah; Gantman, Ana; Vanaman, Matthew; Wylie, Jordan; Storbeck, Justin; ... (2021). A creative destruction approach to replication: Implicit work and sex morality across cultures Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 93, p. 104060. Elsevier 10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104060
|
Text
Creative Destruction.Work Morality.JESP.Version of record.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY). Download (1MB) | Preview |
How can we maximize what is learned from a replication study? In the creative destruction approach to re- plication, the original hypothesis is compared not only to the null hypothesis, but also to predictions derived from multiple alternative theoretical accounts of the phenomenon. To this end, new populations and measures are included in the design in addition to the original ones, to help determine which theory best accounts for the results across multiple key outcomes and contexts. The present pre-registered empirical project compared the Implicit Puritanism account of intuitive work and sex morality to theories positing regional, religious, and social class differences; explicit rather than implicit cultural differences in values; self-expression vs. survival values as a key cultural fault line; the general moralization of work; and false positive effects. Contradicting Implicit Puritanism's core theoretical claim of a distinct American work morality, a number of targeted findings re- plicated across multiple comparison cultures, whereas several failed to replicate in all samples and were iden- tified as likely false positives. No support emerged for theories predicting regional variability and specific in- dividual-differences moderators (religious affiliation, religiosity, and education level). Overall, the results provide evidence that work is intuitively moralized across cultures.
Item Type: |
Journal Article (Original Article) |
|---|---|
Division/Institute: |
School of Health Professions > Midwifery |
Name: |
Tierney, Warren; Hardy, Jay; Ebersole, Charles R.; Viganola, Domenico; Clemente, Elena Giulia; Gordon, Michael; Hoogeveen, Suzanne; Haaf, Julia; Dreber, Anna; Johannesson, Magnus; Pfeiffer, Thomas; Huang, Jason L.; Vaughn, Leigh Ann; DeMarree, Kenneth; Igou, Eric; Chapman, Hanah; Gantman, Ana; Vanaman, Matthew; Wylie, Jordan; Storbeck, Justin; Andreychick, Michael R.; McPhetres, Jon; Culture & Work Morality Forecasting Collaboration, CWMFC and Uhlmann, Eric Luis |
Subjects: |
B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology |
ISSN: |
0022-1031 |
Publisher: |
Elsevier |
Language: |
English |
Submitter: |
Jean Anthony Grand-Guillaume-Perrenoud |
Date Deposited: |
20 Jan 2021 09:59 |
Last Modified: |
24 Jan 2021 01:33 |
Publisher DOI: |
10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104060 |
Additional Information: |
Dr. Stephan Oelhafen, Abteilung Geburtshilfe, Berner Fachhochschule, ist Co-Autor und Mitglied des Culture and Work Morality Forecasting Collaboration. |
ARBOR DOI: |
10.24451/arbor.13841 |
URI: |
https://arbor.bfh.ch/id/eprint/13841 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |