Accuracy of the Multisensory Wristwatch Polar Vantage's Estimation of Energy Expenditure in Various Activities: Instrument Validation Study.

Gilgen-Ammann, Rahel; Schweizer, Theresa; Wyss, Thomas (2019). Accuracy of the Multisensory Wristwatch Polar Vantage's Estimation of Energy Expenditure in Various Activities: Instrument Validation Study. JMIR mhealth and uhealth, 7(10), e14534. JMIR Publications Inc. 10.2196/14534

[img]
Preview
Text
GilgenAmmann_AccuracyOfTheMultisensoryWristwatchPolarVantageEstimationOfEEinVariousActivities_2019.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY).

Download (153kB) | Preview

Sport watches and fitness trackers provide a feasible way of obtaining energy expenditure (EE) estimations in daily life as well as during exercise. However, today's popular wrist-worn technologies show only poor-to-moderate EE accuracy. Recently, the invention of optical heart rate measurement and the further development of accelerometers in wrist units have opened up the possibility of measuring EE. This study aimed to validate the new multisensory wristwatch Polar Vantage and its EE estimation in healthy individuals during low-to-high-intensity activities against indirect calorimetry. Overall, 30 volunteers (15 females; mean age 29.5 [SD 5.1] years; mean height 1.7 [SD 0.8] m; mean weight 67.5 [SD 8.7] kg; mean maximal oxygen uptake 53.4 [SD 6.8] mL/min·kg) performed 7 activities-ranging in intensity from sitting to playing floorball-in a semistructured indoor environment for 10 min each, with 2-min breaks in between. These activities were performed while wearing the Polar Vantage M wristwatch and the MetaMax 3B spirometer. After EE estimation, a mean (SD) of 69.1 (42.7) kcal and 71.4 (37.8) kcal per 10-min activity were reported for the MetaMax 3B and the Polar Vantage, respectively, with a strong correlation of r=0.892 (P<.001). The systematic bias was 2.3 kcal (3.3%), with 37.8 kcal limits of agreement. The lowest mean absolute percentage errors were reported during the sitting and reading activities (9.1%), and the highest error rates during household chores (31.4%). On average, 59.5% of the mean EE values obtained by the Polar Vantage were within ±20% of accuracy when compared with the MetaMax 3B. The activity intensity quantified by perceived exertion (odds ratio [OR] 2.028; P<.001) and wrist circumference (OR -1.533; P=.03) predicted 29% of the error rates within the Polar Vantage. The Polar Vantage has a statistically moderate-to-good accuracy in EE estimation that is activity dependent. During sitting and reading activities, the EE estimation is very good, whereas during nonsteady activities that require wrist and arm movement, the EE accuracy is only moderate. However, compared with other available wrist-worn EE monitors, the Polar Vantage can be recommended, as it performs among the best.

Item Type:

Journal Article (Original Article)

Division/Institute:

Swiss Federal Institute of Sports Magglingen SFISM
Swiss Federal Institute of Sports Magglingen SFISM > EHSM - Lehre und Sportpädagogik > Monitoring

Name:

Gilgen-Ammann, Rahel;
Schweizer, Theresa and
Wyss, Thomas

ISSN:

2291-5222

Publisher:

JMIR Publications Inc.

Language:

English

Submitter:

Admin import user

Date Deposited:

21 Sep 2020 11:00

Last Modified:

21 Sep 2020 11:00

Publisher DOI:

10.2196/14534

Related URLs:

PubMed ID:

31579020

Uncontrolled Keywords:

activity monitor mHealth and eHealth validation Monitoring

ARBOR DOI:

10.24451/arbor.11052

URI:

https://arbor.bfh.ch/id/eprint/11052

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
Provide Feedback